I don’t see much of that myself. Either it’s mostly from the few people I have blocked or it’s the communities I’m not in.

I’m also not sure why negative and rude is the same as dispassionate to you. Maybe that’s why we’re not seeing the same things. Or maybe that’s not what you meant to say, but that’s how this reads to me.

Why does plex need all of this shit? I literally only wanted to use it to stream my local stuff. Now that’s just a tiny part of the app.

I say now, but I don’t think I’ve used it at all in the past couple of years.

I respect your ethical take. But my respect doesn’t put food on your table. Do what you have to do to sleep at night, and maybe that’s an ethical decision or maybe it’s just knowing you sleep better with a roof over your head.

If you consider yourself a highly ethical person, I wouldn’t be in sales of I were you. It’s hard to find really successful salesmen without a lot of gray area in their ethics.

But at the end is the day, you probably can’t know that your boss won’t find a way to deliver. Anyway good luck. Sounds like a difficult position to be in.

How are you supposed to quote a service or project that you don’t have any experience or pricing information for? I would suggest it’s on your boss to deliver what he told you to include and not on you unless you know he has no intention to provide what is offered. Also, including something that doesn’t get delivered might allow the customer to withdraw or renegotiate the contract.

Obviously you don’t want to do something unethical, but I guess I’d just say to think carefully about what is really your responsibility and what isn’t.

They learn far more by watching than by listening. If you want to have great kids, be a great person. That was where I failed them.

Beyond that, responsibility and intellectual curiosity and independent thought. I mostly nailed that last one… those little assholes never listen to me even when I have receipts—it has to be receipts they give a damn about. I couldn’t be more proud, but they are difficult.

I really have other things to deal with today but if you’ve been through or been around high school drama and still have that question… idk what to say. They can consent but that doesn’t mean they make good decisions.

Yeah? Tell me more about how I should be helping kids fuck and how perfectly normal that is.

I don’t know that I’d agree it’s unnatural. My observation, from far too many years on the internet, is that fighting passionately over minor differences is quite natural. But it’s all very impersonal here, and if someone seems to be really intense about an issue, or if I feel myself getting that way, it’s time to take a break from that conversation. Maybe block them if it seem consistent because sometimes you just can’t have a healthy conversation with a person and what’s the point of engaging with them, then?

I’m really suspicious of anyone who doesn’t hold a single opinion that differs with the zeitgeist. I don’t expect anyone to agree with me all the time, and I don’t agree with anyone on issue B just because we happen to align on issue A. And don’t even get me started on morons I agree with, but who make terrible arguments I’m going to be expected to hold with and defend by association.

Then I step away from the computer and go deal with the nuances of life where nothing is so clear cut as the hypotheticals we engage with online.

I didn’t say they couldn’t have sex. Or wouldn’t. I said not to condone it. I wouldn’t encourage it happening by inviting my children’s boyfriends/girlfriends to come over and have sex.

Perhaps this sounds unhinged in Sweden, but this is a liberal attitude in America—not the most liberal attitude, to be sure, but folks who condone kids having sex are often seen as about one step removed from pedophiles here, despite all of us knowing it happens and having done it ourselves. Hypocrisy abounds.

Most Americans sound more like my wife. “Fuck no. End of conversation.” Perhaps punctuated with hysterical laughter at the suggestion that such a question would even be contemplated.

But I also come to this post inferring that OP is weighing choices and trying to decide if his instinct is overly restrictive/permissive, and I support the idea that it’s a serious question. That it’s okay to feel it’s wrong but question whether it really is. Or visa versa. Hence my answer.

I don’t judge how anyone else chooses to live, but if someone asks an opinion, I’ll give it.

So… there is no way she would be sleeping over in his bedroom in this house.

When I was a kid roughly that age, I had sleepovers with girlfriends on a couple of certain occasions involving travel. Either she was invited to spend the weekend at my grandparents’ cottage, or I think I was invited to attend an event with my girlfriend’s dad.

I/she slept on a couch in the living room in both cases. In both cases, sex was had anyway, despite their best attempts, but at least the attempt was made. Sex wasn’t condoned and that’s what I would aim for to be honest.

Can they do a sleepover? I guess if you are okay with it and you hear from her parents that they are okay with it, then you can go for it, but IMO you should make it clear that sex is not to happen and you should take steps to prevent it from happening… with the understanding that it will probably happen regardless, but you can’t really prevent it anyway. Make sure protection is available if there are any concerns.

That’s how I’d handle it, anyway, if it were up to me. I’m also certain my wife’s answer would be, “absolutely fucking not,” so my answer is somewhat moot, which perhaps gives me a little freedom to have a more permissive viewpoint towards things.

AI is just a fun toy. It can’t make “art.” There are CEOs out there fucking thirsty at the idea of a 59% unemployment rate because everyone else is cut out of their business, but AI can’t do the job and they will learn that the hard way after fucking over a bunch of people.

Even the success stories seem skeptical. I use AI all the time at work to assist with coding, and beyond that I use it all the time for fun—my job is safe because AI is fucking awful at it.

So anyway I don’t hate it per se, but I don’t like it other than jokey shit. But I don’t want to see it everywhere, either.

Reflection in the water looks [reasonably] good. Sun in the sky is still a big monochromatic square.

It’s uh… great? I guess? But it’s still fundamentally a game that exists in a cube-world. Awesome graphics aren’t really the point.

Worked a contract job for them. Would agree.

I’m not going to be out of house and home (at least I can weather it for a while) but beyond that, we’ll just have to see. Used to be I could find a new spot within a week or two, but the market has really turned in the last couple of years.

I appreciate your concern, but my wife is still working, making about half of what I normally do, and we are getting our health insurance through her. We largely live below our means, so we’ll be alright for a bit.

You know, unless some crazy dictator comes along and starts trashing the economy… oh…

No interesting drama because I work from home. I am getting laid off next Friday, though, so that’s nice. (Or have been laid off, last day is Friday, whatever makes more sense.)

Magic Shell is an ice cream topping.

I try to make my user names things I have no particular attachment to because I tend to cycle them about every few years. I did it 3 times on Reddit. I’ll likely do the same here eventually.

He 100% can affect elections, refute their legitimacy, send in “inspectors,” or whatever else. And remember even if you think it’s not legal, he can’t be prosecuted for anything done in an official capacity, and he can pardon anyone who does break federal law.

He can do fucking anything and our only recourse is the legal system, which will take months or years to play out, and ultimately the Supreme Court is on his side even if they don’t agree with everything he does.

But there is the question of if he has the balls to do it, if he can do it all in time, if he makes it that far without choking on a hamberder, and how much resistance he encounters. I’m not defeated, just thinking strategically. We may have to prepare to fight for ourselves because the Democratic Party as a whole really cares more about stability than any ideology (and to be fair, it appears in swing states that might be exactly that their constituents largely want, and ideologues would never have gotten elected in the first place).

Democracy must be defended, constantly. Sometimes with blood. Hopefully we aren’t there yet, but I wouldn’t expect to be rescued and that doesn’t mean we are defeated.

What it would mean is that someone bought some stock at that price/share.

It was intentional irony.

That people are fundamentally benevolent to one another. Obviously it can be trained out of you by circumstance, overcome by self-interest, and mental illness is a thing, but I think people innately care for one another. It’s why dehumanization is the first step to committing atrocities.

But if someone offered proof that I’m wrong that might be the least surprising thing that happened all week. And if I’m wrong, the evil-doers are sub-human and should be culled without mercy until I am right.