• oceanA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Some people hate the eu but I swear I only hear wins

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The cookie law isn’t dumb, but at this point it should maybe be reformed. Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required. Instead of complaining about the cookie banner law, people should complain about websites who sell their users’ data.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            The dumb bit of the law is the fact that websites are allowed to put up an annoying banner that says either accept cookies or individually deselect 240 checkboxes.

          • denshi@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required.

            That is actually the status quo. If a website only uses cookies that are needed to make the website function, there is no need for a banner or dialogue. These cookie banners are there deliberately to be annoying so you’ll agree to more than is necessary.

          • jarfil@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The newest take on cookies, is “accept all, or pay to read”. Quite shady, if you ask me.