The source of your article is LinkedIn. Citing articles via a LinkedIn post still makes it a LinkedIn post. That isn’t peer reviewed. Stating fact based on your article and then sharing I’ve considered similar thoughts is not bad faith.
As usual for vegan communities, you’re assuming the worst. Immediately reporting a response that doesn’t 100% is why these communities are toxic.
no it isnt, its sourcing a quote from linkedin because thats where it was posted. The actual study is linked elsewhere. Learn to read before you write.
That article’s source is a LinkedIn post 0_o
That would be interesting if true though, but seems cruel. I’ve considered this for my pets but thought it u healthy and mean
Cherry-picking while conveniently ignoring the study.
You reported my comment 0_o, the article cites that source. Chill.
How can you tell that I made a report? I did it because you’re arguing in bad faith.
The sources mentioned in the article are:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0284132
https://sustainablepetfood.info/vegetarian-feline-diets/#3
Because I’m an admin.
The source of your article is LinkedIn. Citing articles via a LinkedIn post still makes it a LinkedIn post. That isn’t peer reviewed. Stating fact based on your article and then sharing I’ve considered similar thoughts is not bad faith.
As usual for vegan communities, you’re assuming the worst. Immediately reporting a response that doesn’t 100% is why these communities are toxic.
You’re just focusing on the LinkedIn post while ignoring the substance of the article. Great a classic concern troll.
no it isnt, its sourcing a quote from linkedin because thats where it was posted. The actual study is linked elsewhere. Learn to read before you write.
That’s clearly not what it says. Good job fulfilling the rude vegan role though.