• naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t think that’s true. That’s like saying that watching hours of guitar YouTube is enough to learn to play. You need to practice too, and learn from mistakes.

    • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s quite accurate.

      The “understand it well enough to explain it to a professor” clause is carrying a lot of weight here - if that part is fulfilled, then yeah, you’re actually learning something.

      Unless of course, all of the professors are awful at their jobs too. Most of mine were pretty good at asking very pointed questions to figure out what you actually know, and could easily unmask a bullshit artist with a short conversation.

    • nednobbins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s more like if played a song on Guitar Hero enough to be able to pick up a guitar and convince a guitarist that you know the song.

      Code from ChatGPT (and other LLMs) doesn’t usually work on the first try. You need to go fix and add code just to get it to compile. If you actually want it to do whatever your professor is asking you for, you need to understand the code well enough to edit it.

      It’s easy to try for yourself. You can go find some simple programming challenges online and see if you can get ChatGPT to solve a bunch of them for you without having to dive in and learn the code.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        I mean I feel like depending on what kind of problems they started off with ChatGPT probably could just solve simple first year programming problems. But yeah as you get to higher level classes it will definitely not fully solve the stuff for you and you’d have to actually go in and fix it.