m_f@discuss.online to The Far Side@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 days ago5 March 2025discuss.onlineexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1126
arrow-up1126external-link5 March 2025discuss.onlinem_f@discuss.online to The Far Side@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareM137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoIt’s still “alive”, so he has to chop it one or several times more to “kill” it. Imagine that the tree is a fish, it’s common to smash one on the head and think it’s dead, then it starts wiggling around so you need to smash it again.
minus-squaredunyol@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 days agoAfter falling, the tree trunk was still connected to the stump and was starting to rise again. Only when the lumberjack chopped the remaining bit did the trunk fall for good.
Can you explain?
It’s still “alive”, so he has to chop it one or several times more to “kill” it. Imagine that the tree is a fish, it’s common to smash one on the head and think it’s dead, then it starts wiggling around so you need to smash it again.
After falling, the tree trunk was still connected to the stump and was starting to rise again.
Only when the lumberjack chopped the remaining bit did the trunk fall for good.