Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agoMeritocracy of Serving Capitallemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1592file-text
arrow-up1592imageMeritocracy of Serving Capitallemmy.worldUnruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresatans_methpipe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoI thought most science was organized around murdering people. War efforts and such.
minus-squaredustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoincorrect. science is a method to measure reality and come to conclusions based on fact. it has no bias.
minus-squaresatans_methpipe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·22 hours agoI was being smarmy. Science attracts funding and public interest when it’s used to manufacture war materials (munitions, guidance, etc.)
minus-squareSauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 hours agoUnder capitalism, yes. Capitalism severely undervalues anything that is not immediately exploitable by rich assholes.
minus-squareChakravanti@monero.townlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 hours agoNo, not as you say but as he does, yes. Science was funded and motivated in the supply for such. Doesn’t matter how much science was done or by whom. Ask the Crow. Your being correct in your statement doesn’t counter his.
I thought most science was organized around murdering people. War efforts and such.
incorrect. science is a method to measure reality and come to conclusions based on fact. it has no bias.
I was being smarmy. Science attracts funding and public interest when it’s used to manufacture war materials (munitions, guidance, etc.)
Under capitalism, yes. Capitalism severely undervalues anything that is not immediately exploitable by rich assholes.
No, not as you say but as he does, yes. Science was funded and motivated in the supply for such. Doesn’t matter how much science was done or by whom. Ask the Crow.
Your being correct in your statement doesn’t counter his.