No you didn’t. Show me where I said you claim I did. I explicitly said the streamer did not deserve this and these bigots are wrong. I don’t know how much clearer I could be.
I mean at the end of the day if you don’t want people to come at you with their shit takes you shouldn’t put your stuff out for the public to see. That is also a choice.
In the context of the comment you were responding to? Yes!
Count your downvotes dude. Who is arguing in bad faith? I think you should take a second and go back and read the thread from the beginning from the mindset of someone who doesn’t know what’s going on in your head.
In case it isn’t clear, it sounds like you’re belittling harassment to what you want to call a “shit take”, and that you think that harassment is basically the fault of the harrassee for doing whatever they do in “public”. Maybe that isn’t what you meant, but to the rest of us, that’s what you said.
I’m sorry is this argument hinging on our disagreeing about the term “shit take”?
I was talking generally about putting thoughts and ideas out for the public to respond to. I specifically said these people were bigoted and wrong. I do not understand why this is so complicated. What they did was wrong. The streamer did not deserve it. How much clearer can I be? What the fuck do you need, a signed affidavit?
Whatever. You asked why I went off on what you said and I’m explaining why. You keep questioning that. If you don’t get it, you’re obviously obtuse. I’m not the only one who thought what you said was bad. It actually doesn’t matter what you said afterwards. What you said was normalizing harassment of people who put there work out in public, and you won’t admit it. You just keep saying the same thing over that that isn’t what you said. I was the second person to tell you what you said was bad. Many people downvoted you. If you want another opinion, give an LLM the original comment and your response, and ask it how your response could be interpreted. It will probably tell you that you were normalizing harassment.
Appealing to an LLM to settle a dispute about what someone else said/means when the person is telling you exactly what they said/mean is probably the most bizarre attempt at being right I’ve ever seen.
Have you never been in a misunderstanding before? Are people never allowed to clarify what they mean? Have you never gone back, reread something, and gone “oh I read it a different way, but now I see what they meant”?
Have a good one, feel free to have the last word. I’m sure it’s very important to you.
No you didn’t. Show me where I said you claim I did. I explicitly said the streamer did not deserve this and these bigots are wrong. I don’t know how much clearer I could be.
You:
So a shit take is a public harassment?
Christ this is in such bad faith dude.
In the context of the comment you were responding to? Yes!
Count your downvotes dude. Who is arguing in bad faith? I think you should take a second and go back and read the thread from the beginning from the mindset of someone who doesn’t know what’s going on in your head.
In case it isn’t clear, it sounds like you’re belittling harassment to what you want to call a “shit take”, and that you think that harassment is basically the fault of the harrassee for doing whatever they do in “public”. Maybe that isn’t what you meant, but to the rest of us, that’s what you said.
I’m sorry is this argument hinging on our disagreeing about the term “shit take”?
I was talking generally about putting thoughts and ideas out for the public to respond to. I specifically said these people were bigoted and wrong. I do not understand why this is so complicated. What they did was wrong. The streamer did not deserve it. How much clearer can I be? What the fuck do you need, a signed affidavit?
You tell me. I’ve explained what it sounds like you’re saying to the rest of us.
Literally told you what I am saying. It doesn’t matter what you thought I said. My previous comment was clear as day unless you’re illiterate.
Whatever. You asked why I went off on what you said and I’m explaining why. You keep questioning that. If you don’t get it, you’re obviously obtuse. I’m not the only one who thought what you said was bad. It actually doesn’t matter what you said afterwards. What you said was normalizing harassment of people who put there work out in public, and you won’t admit it. You just keep saying the same thing over that that isn’t what you said. I was the second person to tell you what you said was bad. Many people downvoted you. If you want another opinion, give an LLM the original comment and your response, and ask it how your response could be interpreted. It will probably tell you that you were normalizing harassment.
Appealing to an LLM to settle a dispute about what someone else said/means when the person is telling you exactly what they said/mean is probably the most bizarre attempt at being right I’ve ever seen.
Have you never been in a misunderstanding before? Are people never allowed to clarify what they mean? Have you never gone back, reread something, and gone “oh I read it a different way, but now I see what they meant”?
Have a good one, feel free to have the last word. I’m sure it’s very important to you.