Two views:

God is all that is eternal, unchanging, unceasing….

Consciousness is separate from mind, which is all the one consciousness, or Brahman.

I really appreciate Buddhist thought because I find it deeply logical and true. Impermanence and no-self are freeing ideas to me. Whereas, these advaita ideas are a very romantic view of the world, I don’t find them true.

They do make me want to know more about Buddhist emptiness and Buddha-nature in relation to those ideas.

That said, I will complement something the speaker replied to the question “how to practice detachment when being a father?” He said, don’t, that would make you a bad father. Lol! You should treat each person as if they’re Brahman then all your actions are sacred.

I think the Buddhist version of this is commonly seen in Tibetan Buddhism, making all of your world and actions part of a Mandala. Garchen Rinpoche discussed this in his documentary when in prison.

Listening to advaita overall is enjoyable because it posses interesting thoughts and questions that makes me want to understand the different views more while deepening my Buddhist path.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta?wprov=sfti1#Differences_from_Buddhism

Another of their big things in nondualism? How does this exist in Buddhism?

Some regard tathagatagarbha do be a form of nondualism, saying all beings are not separate from Buddha nature or the ability to become enlightened.

In Madhyamaka there is no separation between conventional and ultimate truth, nirvana and samsara.

Yogacara says there is no duality between subject and object. But unlike Advaita, mind streams don’t have a singular origin.