such evasion, come on would it have been better for the gazans with harris as president?
Don’t pretend to care about the people of Gaza. You literally just called them all terrorists and expendable.
You don’t care about the people of Gaza and you never have. You exposed your true self not more than 2 replies back: It was less important for you for the Democrats to win the election, than it was that they keep a pro-genocide stance.,
You are pro-genocide, and if the party would have turned against that, it would have been a problem for you.
So it comes back to the first point which started this all: If Democrats are centering a racist and progenocide voters priorities, they will not win elections.
Thank you for giving us a lens into your thinking. You’ve even given me considerations I hadn’t had before. Previously I assumed this “shut the fuck up and line up behind in support of genocide” approach to politics coming from your camp as based in fear. That you genuinely were afraid of Trump, of losing to Trump, of the consequences of that. I had offered you at least the charity that it wasn’t something more nefarious.
But you’ve done the work for me. For you, it was never about beating Trump. It was always about keeping the Democrats supporting a genocide. When I have to make this point again, I’ll be referencing this thread.
you sure did the work for trump by attacking the democrats, i don’t think he’s gonna thank you though, and the damage on the US might well be permanent
do you think the US would have been better off with Harris?
Who is it that you think your rhetoric is working on?
Since its become clear that your only point in silencing dissent within the party was to keep the candidates support for a genocide in place, every continuance you offer simply affirms the, now demonstrated to be fact, assumption that you criticisms were always in bad faith.
Have you been banned for this racism before? If I dig into the details of your account, will I find out that this is a consistent pattern of behavior from you?
Baseless? My poor child, just click back a few threads. Your words are the basis. The things you do are the basis. The part where you equated being Gazan with being a terrorist, in a racist manner: thats the racism.
When you do that thing: its called racism. And it seems, by looking at your account, that you’ve been banned not only once, but many many times for demonstrating this kind of racism. Here is a link to you being banned for this specific form of racism, well, regularly: https://lemmy.world/modlog?userId=346837
I didn’t ban you for racism. I didn’t even know you had been banned for being racist against Palestinians until you outed yourself here, by being racist, and I looked further.
But again, I must say thank you. As you continue to behave as you are behaving here, you gather support to me, and diminish support from yourself. I appreciate you doing the work of convincing people to abandon your approach to politics, because it means I have to do far less. If you were able to better disguise your motives, this could actually be challenging. Thankfully, you aren’t that subtle.
Bruh you’ve been banned no fewer than 8 times for racism.
You interchangeably use the word “Gazan” and “terrorist”.
Which is like, terrible. But please, if you want precisely 0 people to ever even consider your stance or politics in good faith, continuing putting yourself on display. Because its working. You’ll have driven literally everyone away from your positions with this approach to rhetoric. My role in this is to keep you going, to continue to put yourself on display. Because from my perspective, the more people who understand that by adopting your approaches to politics and strategy, that they are supporting racism; that its not in good faith: the easier it will be to convince them that they need to reject racism and demand better from candidates in the future. I’ll be able to win the rhetorical hearts and minds, because it will be impeccably clear that your entire approach to politics is a flimsy veil for your racism.
It will be far easier to convince people to demand more from their candidates when I can show, that those arguing for us to simply “get in line and shut the fuck up” were actually deeply racist and only doing so to ensure that the candidate maintained a pro-genocide stance.
Every reply you offer, it gathers strength to my cause.
wooooooow i think you out-of-body projected there
such evasion, come on would it have been better for the gazans with harris as president?
Don’t pretend to care about the people of Gaza. You literally just called them all terrorists and expendable.
You don’t care about the people of Gaza and you never have. You exposed your true self not more than 2 replies back: It was less important for you for the Democrats to win the election, than it was that they keep a pro-genocide stance.,
You are pro-genocide, and if the party would have turned against that, it would have been a problem for you.
So it comes back to the first point which started this all: If Democrats are centering a racist and progenocide voters priorities, they will not win elections.
Thank you for giving us a lens into your thinking. You’ve even given me considerations I hadn’t had before. Previously I assumed this “shut the fuck up and line up behind in support of genocide” approach to politics coming from your camp as based in fear. That you genuinely were afraid of Trump, of losing to Trump, of the consequences of that. I had offered you at least the charity that it wasn’t something more nefarious.
But you’ve done the work for me. For you, it was never about beating Trump. It was always about keeping the Democrats supporting a genocide. When I have to make this point again, I’ll be referencing this thread.
you sure did the work for trump by attacking the democrats, i don’t think he’s gonna thank you though, and the damage on the US might well be permanent
do you think the US would have been better off with Harris?
Who is it that you think your rhetoric is working on?
Since its become clear that your only point in silencing dissent within the party was to keep the candidates support for a genocide in place, every continuance you offer simply affirms the, now demonstrated to be fact, assumption that you criticisms were always in bad faith.
Have you been banned for this racism before? If I dig into the details of your account, will I find out that this is a consistent pattern of behavior from you?
Edit: Bing bing bing bing! We have a winner:
i’ve noticed with fundamentalists that they can’t answer direct questions
they live in a myopic fantasy world and can’t acknowledge the consequences of their actions
if you do they lash out with baseless accusations
Baseless? My poor child, just click back a few threads. Your words are the basis. The things you do are the basis. The part where you equated being Gazan with being a terrorist, in a racist manner: thats the racism.
When you do that thing: its called racism. And it seems, by looking at your account, that you’ve been banned not only once, but many many times for demonstrating this kind of racism. Here is a link to you being banned for this specific form of racism, well, regularly: https://lemmy.world/modlog?userId=346837
I didn’t ban you for racism. I didn’t even know you had been banned for being racist against Palestinians until you outed yourself here, by being racist, and I looked further.
But again, I must say thank you. As you continue to behave as you are behaving here, you gather support to me, and diminish support from yourself. I appreciate you doing the work of convincing people to abandon your approach to politics, because it means I have to do far less. If you were able to better disguise your motives, this could actually be challenging. Thankfully, you aren’t that subtle.
what racism?
do you work in a cinema, with this amount of projection…
thanks to you people are too worried about trump and putin to care about whatever extremist cause you’re peddling
Bruh you’ve been banned no fewer than 8 times for racism.
You interchangeably use the word “Gazan” and “terrorist”.
Which is like, terrible. But please, if you want precisely 0 people to ever even consider your stance or politics in good faith, continuing putting yourself on display. Because its working. You’ll have driven literally everyone away from your positions with this approach to rhetoric. My role in this is to keep you going, to continue to put yourself on display. Because from my perspective, the more people who understand that by adopting your approaches to politics and strategy, that they are supporting racism; that its not in good faith: the easier it will be to convince them that they need to reject racism and demand better from candidates in the future. I’ll be able to win the rhetorical hearts and minds, because it will be impeccably clear that your entire approach to politics is a flimsy veil for your racism.
It will be far easier to convince people to demand more from their candidates when I can show, that those arguing for us to simply “get in line and shut the fuck up” were actually deeply racist and only doing so to ensure that the candidate maintained a pro-genocide stance.
Every reply you offer, it gathers strength to my cause.
hmm that’s not what the logs show
you made the racist inference not me
you’re projecting again and throwing accusations because that’s your only way of handling tough questions