• PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      non-maga right wing

      How many of those are left? Two, three?

      I remember before 2016, I had respect for some right-wing folk online who, while far from agreement with me, I regarded as simply legitimately misguided (in a “Free markets because gubmint bad”) kind of way.

      It was… eye-opening to see how many of them went mask-off in the Trump years, and how fast and fiercely they did it.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Given what the USA considers rightwing (lunatic) compared to Europe, I’d rather ignore tankies when they go further than I prefer. I at least agree with them some of the time. USA rightwingers are deranged even if they aren’t in the MAGA sphere.

      We had shooters killing doctors already in the 90s and it’s only got worse since then.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Authoritarian Communism or Socialism. They are generally in favor of a strong military and central state government that projects power and maintains social order, and ideally social progress through strict law and order methods people who look at Mao and Stalin as necessary or a net gain at least, hopefully they aren’t into Pol Pot’s methodology, as it was clear his primary objective was to constantly purge his own supporters while trying to starve and kill anyone that wasn’t a multi generational rice farmer of strictly Cambodian ethnicity or identity. But Pol Pot isn’t like totally out of pocket for what they’d like to see happen either. So yeah. Authoritarian Communism or Socialism, police state, rolling tanks over disodances. Hence Tankies.

        • transitinoir@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They are not called tankies because of rolling tanks though

          The term “tankie” was originally used by dissident Marxist–Leninists to describe members of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) who followed the party line of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Specifically, it was used to distinguish party members who spoke out in defence of the Soviet use of tanks to suppress the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the 1968 Prague Spring, or who more broadly adhered to pro-Soviet positions.[6][7]

          From Wikipedia

      • Imhotep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Do you actually don’t know, or is this step one of a contrarian about to start their brilliant exposé?

        Lets assume this is sincere and you don’t have access to a search engine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

        edit: 2 years on Lemmy and you don’t know what a tankie is, lucky you

        • teslasaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m asking since i was wondering what they meant by it. Have seen the word but never bothered to look it up, and instead of infering the meaning I asked.

          Don’t use Wikipedia as a source if you want to come off as serious. Thats like, middle school level knowledge, at least in our schools. You still haven’t told me, and I guess that i’ll find several definitions, cause that’s usually how it goes.

          • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Wikipedia is probably the most trustworthy source around. It can be wrong so you should still verify it if you want to be sure. But, I don’t think there’s another site with a large amount of knowledge that is so consistently accurate.

            What you should have learned from school is that you don’t cite it in your papers, because it’s not the original source for anything. But, you definitely should be using it for your research and using its citations to go deeper.

          • Imhotep@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Don’t use Wikipedia as a source if you want to come off as serious. Thats like, middle school level knowledge, at least in our schools.

            I was spot on.

            • teslasaur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              About being condescending? Yes, you are. You showed what level you’re on by sending a Wikipedia link.

              You’re like one of those troglodytes that answer a question with a lmgtfy-link unsarcastically.