• easily3667@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s memory unsafe and it’s syntax is indistinguishable from the runes which summon cthulu.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Memory unsafe C++ is a choice. With modern C++ you have no excuse for accessing raw pointers or arrays without range checking if memory safety is a priority.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          As I said: There are tools in place in modern C++ that are designed to catch the errors you make. If you are using a raw pointer when you could have used a reference, or accessing an array without range checking, those are choices you’ve made. They may be valid choices in your use-case, but don’t go complaining that the language is “unsafe” when it gives you the option to code with guard rails and you choose to forgo them.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think the memory stuff is pretty good nowadays. I’m sure I saw modern C++ can have a garbage collector. And the syntax is only runelike until you learn it, like any language really. As an industry C# developer I’ve recently taken up C++ as a hobby to better learn the workings of low level code and I’ve been enjoying it so far.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        c# has lovely syntax and languages like it and python are pretty readable with basic coding knowledge. C++ if you don’t know a symbol there’s too many options and the risk of misunderstanding is too high.

        I will agree with your claim “if you learn the syntax then you know the syntax” but I don’t find this valuable.