• CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I’m saying.

    • oceanA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Got you, no argument against that

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn’t talking to imaginary friends all day.

      • oceanA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.