• Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The Romans executed him at the behest of the Pharisees. (e.g. Pontius Pilate washing his hands and the Jews choosing Barrabus to be set free even though he was a known murderer)

      • cicyphus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        roman authority handled Jesus the same they handled any other crucified person. The situation was considered like any other uprising and handled accordingly, not a conspiracy to target him. This is supported by the fact that roman documentation of the crucifixion is blasé.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Jews had their own judiciary (e.g. Sanhedrin) the Jewish leadership sought Jesus’s crucifixion because they considered him a blasphemer for declaring himself as the Messiah equivalent with God, not keeping the laws of Moses, establishing a new covenant and keeping sinful company. The Romans had the Monopoly on violence because they ruled the area but the Jews managed their community. The Romans nailed Jesus to the cross but the Jewish leadership (specifically the Pharisees) put him there. I wouldn’t expect it to seem out of the ordinary for the Romans outside of Pontius Pilate.

          • cicyphus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Sounds like the Roman’s did it bc they couldn’t be bothered with the civil unrest from another of the many cults in the region.