“This is not speculation but econometric fact — the company’s market entry correlates directly with this surge in infant deaths. The data does not lie”
It’s been pretty well documented, and you’re still an asshole for laughing at dead children. It doesn’t matter if you try to dress it up by pretending to be rational, you’re still an asshole.
“This is not speculation but econometric fact — the company’s market entry correlates directly with this surge in infant deaths. The data does not lie”
Okay I’m done here lmao someone skipped stats 101
You’re being an ass, laughing at a situation with a bunch of dead babies, trying to look smart. Knock it off.
You reply to the wrong comment?
No, I’m talking to you, there’s 10 million dead babies and you’re just going lmao correlation lululul
Until there’s reliable scientific evidence, it’s a shitpost that draws on a correlation and correlation is not causation
It’s been pretty well documented, and you’re still an asshole for laughing at dead children. It doesn’t matter if you try to dress it up by pretending to be rational, you’re still an asshole.
Yeah. A rise in infant formula use and infant mortality are incredibly different things that couldn’t possibly be linked in the data. Good take. /s
Yeah, but that needs to be proven beyond coincidence.
Not really, why are you carrying water for one of the most human rights violating corporation on the planet?
You don’t have to do free labor for a corporation that doesn’t think access to water is a human right
“Correlation means causation.”
Isn’t that the saying you learned?
The thing we learned is “correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation”.
Was joking and left off the /s