cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/43444441
Have you ever found yourself mindlessly scrolling through your social media feed, only to realize hours have passed? You’re not alone. In a world where social media dominates our daily interactions, it’s crucial to understand the hidden mechanics that keep us glued to our screens. These platforms are not just tools for connection; they are meticulously designed environments that exploit our psychology to maximize engagement. Let’s dive into the captivating—and often unsettling—world of social media design and its implications for our mental health and well-being.
At the heart of this engagement strategy is infinite scrolling. Imagine a never-ending stream of content that invites you to keep going, with no clear endpoint in sight. This design choice creates a seamless experience that lulls us into a trance-like state, making it all too easy to lose track of time. It’s a clever trick that keeps us engaged without requiring any conscious decision to continue. Pair this with variable rewards—the unpredictable likes, comments, and shares that pop up as we scroll—and you have a recipe for compulsive behavior. It’s akin to the thrill of gambling, where each notification feels like a small win, driving us to chase that next rush of validation.
But the hooks don’t stop there. Notifications are the sirens of the social media world, beckoning us back with promises of new interactions. Each ping creates a sense of urgency, compelling us to check our apps even when we’re busy with other tasks. This constant barrage can lead to heightened anxiety, as we feel the pressure to stay connected. The Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) looms large, pushing us to compulsively check our feeds to ensure we’re not left out of the latest trends or conversations. It’s a design tactic that effectively keeps us tethered to our devices, often at the expense of our mental health.
Then there are personalization algorithms, which curate content specifically for us based on our preferences and behaviors. While this can enhance our experience, it also makes it increasingly difficult to disengage. The more time we spend on the platform, the more tailored our experience becomes, creating a feedback loop that keeps us coming back for more. This is further reinforced by the sense of community and belonging that social media fosters. While it’s wonderful to connect with others, this reliance on online validation can lead to a dependency that’s hard to shake off.
However, the practices of major social media companies raise serious ethical concerns. The extensive collection of user data for targeted advertising purposes raises questions about privacy and consent. These companies often prioritize profit over user well-being, designing features that promote addictive behaviors to maximize engagement. The lack of transparency regarding how our data is used and how algorithms determine what we see can create a sense of distrust. Many users are left in the dark about how their information is being utilized, making it challenging to make informed choices about their engagement.
Critics argue that the relentless pursuit of profit often overshadows the responsibility these companies have to protect user privacy and promote healthy online interactions. The design choices made by these platforms can contribute to negative mental health outcomes, such as anxiety, depression, and feelings of inadequacy. The pressure to maintain an online presence and seek validation through likes and shares can be overwhelming, leading to a detrimental impact on our overall well-being.
Yet, it’s essential to recognize that not all users feel “trapped” by these platforms. Many find genuine value in the connections and content they encounter online. The debate surrounding social media is complex and multifaceted, encompassing both the benefits and drawbacks of these platforms. As users, we must remain vigilant and critical of the design elements that shape our online experiences, striving for a balance between engagement and ethical considerations.
In conclusion, as we navigate this digital landscape, it’s crucial to be aware of the mechanisms at play that keep us engaged. By understanding the design elements that contribute to our online experiences, we can make more informed choices about our social media usage, ultimately leading to a healthier and more balanced digital life. It’s time to take control of our online interactions and ensure that they enhance our lives rather than detract from our well-being. So, the next time you find yourself scrolling endlessly, take a moment to reflect: Are you in control, or is the platform pulling the strings?
Not just lemmy, but every fediverse platform can and should be trying to do better than centralized social media when it comes to mentally harmful / addictive patterns in our apps. I’ve tried to do some things to minimize addiction, but there’s a lot more we could be doing.
If you were to rank the things about lemmy that are most addictive, what would they be? Then we can think of ways to minimize or subvert them, where feasible.
IMO infinite scrolling, seeing the same things over again, and wanting to check like your own content likes / dislikes, are the worst offenders.
People blame algorithms a lot but I think even the core design means that social media is too addictive. Lemmy is addictive even with no algorithm or dodgy corporate ethics for example.
There’s been a lot of turd-polishing and pleasejustalittlebitbroism when it comes to social media in my opinion.
Lemmy becomes an accidental skinner box, but the smaller community means you run out of new content to to scroll and end up logging off (right, y’all log off right?)
Corpo Social Media is designed to be a skinner box, to trap you in the scrolling loop dopamine dripfeed. No content too good hits your feed because if it does it doesn’t work to keep you scrolling.
Lemmy is addictive even with no algorithm or dodgy corporate ethics for example.
Could you elaborate on what you mean by this?
I mean that although it doesn’t include the most egregious functions of corporate social media platforms it is still built around features like upvoting/liking, and infinite scroll, which were originally designed to ‘gamify’ social media in order to make it more addictive.
Lemmy isn’t addictive; it’s a freedom-focused platform that’s easy to use and serves as a great alternative to Reddit, operating on the same principles. I believe that’s why so many people actively use Lemmy—it’s not about addiction at all.
Lemmy is definitely addictive but when comparing it to algorithm oriented platforms, we are basically comparing alcohol to cocaine. Both addictive but one way more than the other.
operating on the same principles
… Which are, by design, addictive.
The upvote/downvote system particularly.
You get a rush every time your comment or post goes goes into the 3 digits in upvotes, be honest.
You don’t need a sophisticated algorithm to have an addictive design either. All you need is for your home feed to give you more of what you want, which is what your subscribed tab does by default.
Lastly, the “ingroup/outgroup” psychological trigger lemmy induces you into (which was copied from Reddit), is also in itself highly engaging.
Literally anything can be addictive. Humans love pressing the dopamine button. The features that Lemmy has which are shared with other social media platforms can definitely increase the addictive potential.
Bro I was literally doomscrolling when I came upon your post, Lemmy definitely is addicting.
I guess we disagree a bit then. Don’t get me wrong - I’m not condemning Lemmy. I think it’s extremely valuable in democratising social media. And it functions brilliantly for communication and sharing knowledge. I’m just saying that a side-effect of its functionality is that it’s also addictive. For example I believe that there users who log in, help each other troubleshoot problems growing their tomatoes and then log out, but at the same time there are users who are passively consuming content from the feed way past their bedtime. There are even memes here about it.
People are lonely. They lack the kinds of interactions in their lives that make them feel comfortable and more importantly allow them to feel seen or understood. The mindless scrolling temporarily fills the void they have in human interaction while allowing them to interact themselves if/when they want to.
Humans are “addicted” to human interaction and the algorithms take advantage of that fact to make a product out of them.
Additionally, human brains seek out novelty. A lot of our day to day lives are filled with work and duties (chores, bills, children) etc. People in the 1920’s weren’t addicted to the news paper. They needed something to do with their free time that didn’t break the bank. Increasingly there’s just not that many things that you can put down to switch gears that fit that bill.
“Dopamine Nation” is a good book on this whole issue. I really wonder how much the dead internet theory might play a role in eventually breaking this cycle, or just younger generations being contrarian to older generations.
The language of this write-up has me envisioning social media as a parallel to the person-shaped holes in Junji Ito’s The Enigma of Amigara Fault.