That is not the correct form of a syllogism. The second premise should be “Some C are A” leading to the conclusion “Some C are B”. With the structure you provided, it is easy to produce invalid conclusions from true premises:
All planets are round
Some fruits are round
Therefore: Some fruits are planets
Whereas a correctly structured syllogism might be:
That is not the correct form of a syllogism. The second premise should be “Some C are A” leading to the conclusion “Some C are B”. With the structure you provided, it is easy to produce invalid conclusions from true premises:
Whereas a correctly structured syllogism might be:
I’m not saying the syllogism is correct, I’m illustrating how Bearistotle is wrong.