• Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 hours ago

    My dipshit coworkers think trump will actually be good for unions. Mfers.

    I’d like to add that 32 hour weeks is pretty much purely something that works for white collar work. It’s considerably harder to implement in blue collar settings.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      My dipshit coworkers think trump will actually be good for unions. Mfers.

      Are y’all in a union? If so, you should see if you and your friends could maybe schedule an appointment with an organizer at your Local, who might be able to walk these chuds through it.

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not true. The electricians in my area work 7 hour days and the sheet metal workers get every other Friday off.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Is the reason it wont work in blue collar settings that it’ll inflate prices of stuff too high? Possible making the country fall back in a global stance on pricing on exports, etc (not competitive)?

      Only other reason I can see is if they need people at the workplace 24/7, but they usually hire more people to make that schedule work (which in return ig increases prices of whatever they are producing).

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Not “won’t work”. Considerably harder. Big difference. There’s companies who have successfully implemented it in blue collar jobs.

        But more put simple, it’s that unlike white collar, output has a direct relationship with how many hours are worked, up to probably nearly 50, more or less depending on the job.

        So, in practice it turned out that slower service was one of the largest problems with it.

        Half of the benefit issue costs would go away with universal healthcare anyways.

        Sure you can get more employees, but people who work don’t magically appear

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          'preciate the edumacation. Definitely sounds like a harder problem to solve, good point on the universal healthcare, I’m sure that could save some money for companies, it’ll make employees happie regardless to not have to worry about paying doctor bills.