• serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Then why tf a game is responsible for their monetory loss? Children are susceptible to many more scams. And on top of that taking such privacy invasive ‘measure’ to solve it doesn’t make sense either. Children can even upload patent’s ids if parents are so careless anyway.

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Damn, got 'em. Actually, they deserve to lose $16,000 while raising a gambling addict because they didn’t pull up their bootstraps and micromanage everything their preteen does in “that colorful game they play.”

        Mate, asking under-13s to get parent permission is provoking that good parenting you seem to care about anyway—what on earth is the problem?

        • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Parental controls (or just not inputting card details into a phone the child has access to) is a fairly effective way to prevent the child spending the parent’s money without then knowing. Micromanagement is not typically considered good parenting; however showing interest in, and having some knowledge of, what your child spends significant time doing is.

          • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Do you have children and have you had to use parental controls for some games? The controls largely suck so much and just end up being a source of endless frustration. They are not what I would call effective.

            • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Preventing purchases should (as far as I am aware, is) be an app store level setting on mobile devices. Parental controls should be better than they currently are, but ID requirements (or other PII) are not the solution.

                • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Not everyone buys a separate device for their children or knows how to/can set up a user account.

                  This comment is a parenting related issue, the technicality illiterate might forget to take the proper precautions when letting their child use their phone and blame the game instead of taking responsibility for their actions.

                  • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    No, you’re making it one to sidestep an issue.

                    If this bad parenting happens often enough to be a real problem, then whining into the wind that “no one has any common sense anymore,” or whatever you’re doing, isn’t a solution.

                    I do blame the game a little because it’s a game that really, really, really wants you to spend money on diamond gem funbucks.

                    Let me ask you this question, hm? You don’t want to show your ID even though we all do that for alcohol—fine. Why not: $80 up front, all banners are periodic DLCs, some of them free, there is more than enough korok seeds in game to get all of them, and they never expire—infinite time to twiddle your thumbs before completing them. Would this not solve your ID problem?

                    That is, unless you would like to spearhead this global movement to teach underprivileged parents how to configure their phones?