Spammers, trolls, and ban evaders often use temporary email addresses. PieFed now checks a list of known temporary email providers and displays a warning icon next to registrations that use such services.

If registration mode is set to “Open” (no approval needed) then the site admin(s) receive a notification instead.

A throwaway email address isn’t always a bad thing but it’s one factor that admins might want to take into account.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is just lazy discrimination and a deep disrespect for the privacy of your users. If you can’t be bothered to actually admin a community properly then don’t create a community.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Go create your own then?

        Don’t want to.

        you’re not actually owed anything.

        People in general are owed their privacy and anyone who admins a website owes that to them, but especially fediverse projects that are supposed to be an alternative to surveillance capitalism.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You’re not owed anything when you’re using a free service offered by somebody else, at their personal expense and effort. Nobody’s funding this shit, nobody’s paying for this shit. Definitely not you. You’re free to make suggestions, you’re not free to demand stuff. Overly demanding and obnoxious users like you are why FOSS devs tend to suffer burnout and quit.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Yes I am. Everyone is owed their privacy.

            I’d rather them quit if they can’t be bothered to moderate the site.

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              You can rather whatever you want. As I said, if you believe in it so much, put your money where your mouth is and host something better for the rest of us.

                • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  And as I said, I don’t want to

                  I know. You just want to be a self righteous prick online blaming others who contribute when you don’t.

                  Nor would it solve the problem.

                  Why wouldn’t it? If this is as important an issue as you say it is, surely providing an alternative that meets it would allow others to use the better alternative?

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 hours ago

                    You just want to be a self righteous prick

                    Being concerned for the privacy of people as a whole makes me a prick?

                    blaming others who contribute when you don’t.

                    I don’t know why you assume that I don’t contribute?

                    Why wouldn’t it?

                    Why would it? Is it going to wipe those sites off the internet? No? That’s why. Those sites will still be there, discriminating against users who just want privacy on the internet. That’s like saying Lemmy solves the problems that Reddit creates or Mastodon solves the problems of Xitter. Those problems still exist because people continue to choose to participate in those communities, against their own interests.