Cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/34117495

[OC]

Original still created by @gedogfx (IG). Title source: “Inkl”

Edit: I’m not on any other social media platforms, so feel free to share this elsewhere if you want

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      0·
      15 days ago

      Why?

      Anti-AI is a small primitivism and/or IP protection movement.

      It has nothing to do with the working class struggle. Or the right to have proper healthcare.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        15 days ago

        It’s incredible how successfully the AI topic has been hijacked by copyright propaganda.

        Copyright is bad, period. Barking at AI for using copyrighted shit for training just makes it less accessible to train for anyone BUT the mega rich.

        Let’s say we do ban copyright data for training. Then only Google, Microsoft and Apple can releastically source data for training. That and countries that don’t respect this like China and Iran right? Ok, so now they hired farms of people to produce training material and release their models that NOBODY can compete with. Everything is literally worse in every possible way now and AI is fully owned by corporate overlords.

        I genuinely don’t understand the though process of these people. We want information to be free and accessible to everyone, no?

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        15 days ago

        United Healthcare was using AI to deny claims.

        Also saying AI has nothing to do with the working class struggle is hilarious.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
          0·
          15 days ago

          This is such a stretch. AI used to deny claims and video animation AI are so far apart that you might as well be complaining that both of these two things are using the same electrons 🙄

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            0·
            14 days ago

            Well, I disagree. They may be trained on different data sets but both represent the same ethical problems with generative AI right now, imho.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
              0·
              14 days ago

              Clearly you don’t even know what AI means and just parrot whatever meme you hear. What ethical issues? You’re comparing copyright theft to what? Using machine learning to decide whether insurance claim should be accepted? These aren’t even the same realm of computing and as close as a calculator is to Candy Crush.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                0·
                14 days ago

                So, you don’t think there’s ethical issues with letting machine learning who lives and dies? When did I say they were the exact same technology? Do not assume what I do and do not know based on things I did not say, my friend.

                • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  0·
                  14 days ago

                  Nah dude you said it’s the same ethical issue when it’s clearly not. Machine deciding whether who lives or dies vs what exactly? What’s the other issue that is the same “ethical issue” here with image generating AI? Which part is the same or even remotely similar?

                  Maybe you mean that both technologies are problematic? But that’s really not all that useful because ALL technology is problematic by the very nature of it being a force of change.

                  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                    1·
                    13 days ago

                    No, please read my comment carefully. I said they represent the same ethical problems. You should not use quotes when you are not, you know, actually quoting me.

                    I am maybe not the best with words but I did not mean to imply they are the exact same issue. Please stop replying to me about this topic now.