• stormeuh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    For now, he does have that yes, but his wealth is for a significant portion a house of cards built on the value of tesla stock. If the value of that stock falls far enough, lenders who gave him loans with tesla stock as collateral could margin call him, essentially asking for more collateral. That could make him the poorest person in the world quite quickly, i.e. billions in debt.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      While you’re absolutely correct, even if Musk lost 99.7% percent of his wealth he would still be a billionaire (depending on whose net worth number you choose to use). I wouldn’t hold out seeing him in a bread line or starting a gofundme.

      • Fusselwurm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        huh. showerthought:

        broke: gofundme woke: sell shares/stocks bespoke: have your company subsidized by the state

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The real question is whether the collapse of his house of cards will lead to a 99.7% loss of wealth or >100% loss. He won’t be a billionaire anymore if it’s the latter.

        • Subverb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, he probably will. I know I’d be surprised if he didn’t have money squirreled away somewhere.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’d also be surprised if no one goes after him for trying to run away from debts. If we know anything, it’s that most laws only apply when they benefit the rich, and he’ll be making a lot of rich people angry if it turns out he did have extra money squirreled away.