JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agodotnet developerprogramming.devimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up12
arrow-up12imagedotnet developerprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareOneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSorry, what’s .Net again? The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore? Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
minus-squareXTornado@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago.net core is not a thing anymore in case somebody it’s not aware, now is just .net. (unless you use really old version of course).
minus-squareTrailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago Can’t call it Windows 9 But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility. For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.
Sorry, what’s .Net again?
The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore?
Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
.net core is not a thing anymore in case somebody it’s not aware, now is just .net. (unless you use really old version of course).
But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility.
For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.