“Like the Sailor said quote,
Ain’t that a hole in the boat?”

I think thats a thesis that hasn’t been properly peer reviewed (though it does have some clinical evidence), which is to say its not widely accepted as a reason for it to exist (but that that may be changing).

Suppose thats fair

Agree with the other three, but why would NCR be Auth Left?

While not as Auth Right as The Legion, I def think of them more on that side.

Failed to load media :,(

Doing a side-by-side, I realize they look pretty different, but def thought this was a Map of Roshar at first.

So according to wikipedia, the US banned lead paint in 1977, while Europe didn’t implement such a ban until 2003 (though some EU countries had such laws before 2003). Additionally several countries are just now beginning to ban lead paints (Turkey, Ukraine, and Georgia didn’t implement bans in after 2020).

While catchy, this argument feels tired.

Thanks for genuine response. Lol, most who interpret my question that way you did don’t seem interested in a good faith discussion. But ol’ boy is def tripping if he thinks SQL isn’t used in the government.

Big thing I’m intending to pry at is whether there would be a legitimate purpose to have duplicated SSNs in the database (thus showing the First Bro doesn’t understand how SQL works).

Yeah, obviously ol’ boy is tripping if he thinks SQL isn’t used in the government.

Big thing I’m prying at is whether there would be a legitimate purpose to have duplicated SSNs in the database (thus showing the First Bro doesn’t understand how SQL works).

Yeah, obviously ol’ boy is tripping if he thinks SQL isn’t used in the government.

Big thing I’m prying at is whether there would be a legitimate purpose to have duplicated SSNs in the database (thus showing the First Bro doesn’t understand how SQL works).

had to join to it

I don’t think I get what this means. As you describe it, that reference id sounds comparable to a pointer, and so there should be a quick look up when you need to de-reference it, but that hardly seems like a “dependency knot”?

I feel like this is showing my own ignorance on the back end if databasing. Can you point me to references that explain this better?

Yeah, obviously ol’ boy is tripping if he thinks SQL isn’t used in the government.

Big thing I’m prying at is whether there would be a legitimate purpose to have duplicated SSNs in the database (thus showing the First Bro doesn’t understand how SQL works).

Yeah, obviously ol’ boy is tripping if he thinks SQL isn’t used in the government.

Big thing I’m prying at is whether there would be a legitimate purpose to have duplicated SSNs in the database (thus showing the First Bro doesn’t understand how SQL works).

Yeah, obviously ol’ boy is tripping if he thinks SQL isn’t used in the government.

Big thing I’m prying at is whether there would be a legitimate purpose to have duplicated SSNs in the database (thus showing the First Bro doesn’t understand how SQL works).

Right. Fingers crossed we figure out national IDs before then.

In responding to other comments, I’ve found similar things.

All the same, thanks for the resources!

Was trying to find something from the SSA itself on the topic, but didn’t turn anything useful up on the quick.

Here is a link for the lazy on the topic: https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/odds-someone-else-has-your-ssn-one-7-6C10406347

Said this elsewhere, but wanted to be sure you had the chance to see the linked material. The Social Security FAQ page (Q 20, specifically) says that they do not do re-use of old SSNs when people die.

I don’t want to come off as a bot spamming this in a bunch of different comment threads, but The Social Security FAQ page (Q 20, specifically) says that they do not do re-use of old SSNs when people die.

The Social Security FAQ page (Q 20, specifically) says that they do not do re-use of old SSNs when people die.