≠

I imagine one wins by jumping in to the little hole in the middle and then gets to control the big boy for a few moves. Then it’s rinse and repeat two more times

If I’m free to discuss what ever language quirk I’d want to, then let’s talk about German nouns. How did they end up with three genders (die, das and der) for their nouns? English has none, French has two just like Swedish mostly has two but the Germans ended up with five.

For any English speakers unfamiliar with the concept of noun gender it’s basically a way of grouping nouns. It commonly effects how they word works with other grammar. For example the German genders determine whether die, das or der should be used when English has the and it does, in a more convoluted way involving other grammar to, determine whether ein, eine, einen or einem should be used where English has a/an

I’m not so sure. From a software perspective adding a kill switch is needlessly adding a potential vulnerability. Given that (as many others have said) the planes will need spare parts and software updates anyways I see it as quite unlikely that there would be an kill switch.

Yeap, I’m aware of the Denmark and Greenland situation but I was curious if Greenland had their own instance

Is there a instance for Greenland or is it covered by the danish instance?

I’d assume it’s a question about her tweet

I think I’m a human, but now you’ve made me unsure ):

Common withdrawal symptoms for water include, but are no limited to, dehydration and imminent premature death

y=kx+m

That seems like a fun project, I have myself written two interpreters/simulators and one compiler and it’s a lot of fun. However, that’s something you do for your self, without a ton of effort and dedication you won’t make something useful

And they also decided to put “not applicable” in the center