I feel about the same. I don’t particularly care about it, but it’s nice to know how many I helped. It was intentionally removed, I believe so it doesn’t incentivise karma farms. If karma exists it will be used and there will be reasons to farm it.
Nothing a quick Postgres query can’t fix though :p
Another reason to use ~/.local is you can do things like
./configure --prefix=$HOME/.local
make -j$(ncpu)
make install
And then you get your .local/bin, .local/share, .local/include, .local/lib and such, just like /usr but scoped to your user.
and it should mostly just work as well.
That was 7 years ago, and he seems to have distanced himself from that past. He’s kind of retired from the whole gaming channel thing and does more family life things.
People can grow a lot in 7 years, I sure did.
I really like the positive vibe and “here’s what you can do with Linux, for funsies” instead of the usual “here’s all the problems I had and I switched back”.
No “it’s perfect”, no “it runs all my games”, just “I tried it and had a blast setting it all up”. He’s legit enjoying it and sharing those feelings is powerful.
It’s shaping up to be pretty good at least. It’s pretty good for being in alpha state still.
The main thing it needs to beat for me is Kwin’s excellent Wayland support. Everything just works.
The per-screen workspaces are appealing though.
Not an explanation or proper fix, but running the games through Gamescope might fix it by side effect. In gamescope the game would never lose focus and so shouldn’t have problems resuming afterwards.
For what it’s worth, I experience none of that. My laptop is absolutely rock solid with KDE, it’s like a MacBook you pull it out of your backpack and it’s ready to go before I’m even done opening the screen.
My desktop is currently just over 5 days of continuous uptime (no sleep). I’ve crashed more often because of ZFS than KDE.
Both are ArchLinux. I also have a friend on Bazzite that doesn’t have issues with KDE either, and it runs great in my VM.
Those all sound like possible graphics driver issues.
It’s definitely not for everyone. It’s a very complex show with a lot of symbolism, and you kind of have to think for yourself what’s really the implications of what’s going on.
I was hooked from beginning to end, but it’s definitely pretty boring if you don’t get the subtext, or simply want an easy sit back and relax kind of show.
In that specific context I was still thinking about how you need to run mysql_upgrade after an update, not the regular post upgrade scripts. And Arch does keep those relatively simple. As I said, Arch won’t restart your database for you, and also won’t run mysql_upgrade because it also doesn’t preconfigure a user for itself to do that. And it also doesn’t initialize /var/lib/mysql for you either upon installation. Arch only does maintenance tasks like rebuild your font cache, create system users, reload systemd. And if those scripts fail, it just moves on, it’s your job to read the log and fix it. It doesn’t fail the package installation, it just tells you to go figure it out yourself.
Debian distros will bounce your database and run the upgrade script for you, and if you use unattended upgrades it’ll even randomly bounce in the middle of the night because it pull a critical security update that probably don’t apply to you anyway. It’ll bail out mid dist-upgrade and leave you completely fucked, because it couldn’t restart a fucking database. It’s infuriating, I’ve even managed to get apt to be incapable of deleting a package (or reinstalling it)/because it wanted to run a pre-remove script that I had corrupted in a crash. Apt completely hosed, dpkg completely hosed, it was a pain in the ass.
With the Arch philosophy I still need to fix my database, but at least the rest of my system gets updated perfectly and I can still use pacman to install the tools I need to fix the damn database. I have all those issues with Debian because apt tries to do way too fucking much for its own good.
The Arch philosophy works. I can have that automated, if I asked for it and set up a hook for it.
Pacman just does a lot less work than apt, which keeps things simpler and more straightforward.
Pacman is as close as it gets to just untar’ing the package to your system. It does have some install scripts but they do the bare minimum needed.
Comparatively, Debian does a whole lot more under the hood. It’s got a whole configuration management thing that generates config files and stuff, which is all stuff that can go wrong especially if you overwrote it. Debian just assumes apt can log into your MySQL database for example, to update your tables after updating MySQL. If any of it goes wrong, the package is considered to have failed to install and you get stuck in a weird dependency hell. Pacman does nothing and assumes nothing, its only job is to put the files in the right place. If you want it to start, you start it. If you want to run post-upgrade, you got to do it yourself.
Thus you can yank an Arch system 5 years into the future and if your configs are still valid or default, it just works. It’s technically doable with apt too but just so much more fragile. My Debian updates always fail because NGINX isn’t happy, Apache isn’t happy, MySQL isn’t happy, and that just results in apt getting real unhappy and stuck. And AFAIK there’s no easy way to gaslight it into thinking the package installed fine either.
Yeah that’s a pretty good point. As a technical user that seems solid but for the average user that makes sense.
Isn’t owning the domain proof enough already?
Nobody else could possibly use max-p.me as their handle, and proving control of the domain is plenty for security sensitive things like LetsEncrypt.
Anyone you’d care to mark verified already brought their own domain.
Depends on your goal: do you want to preserve what you can at its best, or do you want to ensure you have plenty of entertainment to go by?
I’d probably go with the lower quality. We watched TV in 480i and under for decades, and 720p is still quite watchable even today. In HEVC or AV1 you can really pack a decent collection.
Server side rendering has become popular again with frameworks like Svelte and Next.js. For a while basic React was popular and entirely on the client side, and thus dependent on JS to work at all.
I do the same but also have a few trap addresses nobody sane should see or email to, but is easy for scrapers to grab. Easy way to train the spam filter.
Even on Reddit there’s been undeleters and archives since basically forever.
Even for regular websites, there’s always the Internet Archive.
It’s hardly a new problem: you always assumed the Internet was forever.
I would distrust my carrier well before I distrust the encryption. Even when roaming, your Internet is tunnelled through your carrier using an internal VPN. It even works in China, that’s a fairly common way to get around their firewall.
The bible.
It’s unfortunately been distorted a lot with translations over time, but it was originally a story about morales in a world of greed.
If Jesus came back he would be crucified again for being too “woke”.
I also wanted to put an emphasis on how working with virtual disks is very much the same as real ones. Same well known utilities to copy partitions work perfectly fine. Same cgdisk/parted and dd dance as you otherwise would.
Technically if you install the arch-install-scripts package on your host, you can even install ArchLinux into a VM exactly as if you were in archiso with the comfort of your desktop environment and browser. Straight up pacstrap it directly into the virtual disk.
Even crazier is, NBD (Network Block Device) is generic so it’s not even limited to disk images. You can forward a whole ass drive from another computer over WiFi and do what you need on it, even pass it to a VM boot it up.
With enough fuckery you could even wrap the partition in a fake partition table and boot the VM off the actual partition and make it bootable by both the host and the VM at the same time.
I think P2P has stood the test of time. Torrents scale extremely well, any large scale video would have so many peers the server wouldn’t have to participate at all. These days most torrents easily saturate my gigabit connection no problem with just a handful of peers. Torrents tends to spread like wildfire.
The main issue would be storage space, but I think a lot of YouTubers would be perfectly okay with spending $5-10 a month to pay for the storage costs with all the benefits you get from not being tied to YouTube’s ToS and policies. It’s a drop in the bucket compared to the earnings from sponsor spots.