Because AI bad, or something.

Sounds like a lot of work. I’ll let you take this one.

This is just supporting my statement.

Is this a bot account? 18 posts in a single hour.

While I’ve yet to see it, I refuse to believe it’s worse than Thor 4. A god butcher who is seen killing only one god? Oof.

Those are some solid beards.

This is not debatable. In the US, the constitution does not guarantee a right to healthcare. No federal or state laws guarantee a right to healthcare. Even though the federal government offer several healthcare related program (medicare, medicad, etc…) but they are not required under any federal law to do so.

To answer your question, yes, I do believe legal citizens should have a right to healthcare. A person should not go bankrupt because they contracted cancer.

So, when you make a statement saying T people are being denied a right to healthcare, you’re spreading misinformation. They have the same rights as myself and every other legal citizen.

I would be equally outraged if the government decided a specific racial group, for example, was told they don’t have the right to an attorney when being prosecuted. Because that would be being denied an actual right that everyone else enjoys.

That’s the lamest way to carry out a threat I’ve ever heard.

Do what I say!

Or else what?

Or else…I’ll send you a…wikipedia link!

Dun dun duuuuun!

I doubt there is a federal, state, or local law, or in the constitution that states you have a right to getting testosterone or estrogen.

And how exactly are you going to carry out that threat?

Of course they exist. You can literally see them. And they have the same rights as I do, assuming they are a legal citizen of the USA.

Oh, wow, a concept someone conceived.

I don’t see an opposing view as intolerance, thus your link is moot.

“if you oppose my views, you’re a bigot, and I don’t debate bigots, hence I won’t debate you. I win”

See, I can put words in quotation marks too. Look how cool we look.

I’m not attempting to help or not help anyone. That’s not my job. But I won’t stifle my words or yours because someone, somewhere thinks it might be “harming” someone.

No. But the offer is appreciated all the same. I know you would love it more if you only engaged with people who think exactly like you, and only have the opinions and conclusions you do. It feels good to constantly have your ideology and agenda confirmed. Makes you feel superior.

No one was talking about gay people. This is the problem when you try to lump a bunch of alphabet letters into the same group. They’re not a monolith.

Basically what you’re saying is, conversation and opposing virepoints is harmful. Which is a fascist view.

I’m all for people making their own choices. But teaching children about sexuality is wrong, let alone assuming a child has the mind to transition their gender. This is sick in the head.

OP’s opinion about teaching young children, too young to grasp the concept of sexuality being wrong is simply their opinion. Many children grow out of gender identity disorder once they reach a certain age (not all, but many).

Your “science” is hotly contested around the world. Simply because you’ve chosen to accept a particular conclusion doesn’t mean everyone has to.

I’m not addressing the grooming nonsense or “used by biogts” comment as they are simply left wing talking points.

I do not suspect I’ll find meaningful dialog here as too many of you are hateful and close minded leading to an inability to have conversation that doesn’t include insults and name calling. Cheers.

I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with this information.

I love the response you’re getting. A wholesome community until you have a different opinion. This is how you know Lemmy is simply comprised of the top crust layer of Reddit. The worst it had to offer.

:(