• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 29th, 2024

help-circle
  • Let me take a step back for a second.

    We are not discussing the strategies used by the far right to demonize trans folk (or anyone else). We are discussing something completely different that has no bearing on the strategies used by the far right. What will me moving away from what you call “my ideal” change in this world?

    Let’s say we have some deus ex machina method to close the discussion around the nature of sex and make everyone believe that sex is a spectrum.

    Do you really think this will magically get rid of transphobia? I would even go as far as saying a lot of the people who claim to be concerned about “trans issues” don’t actually care about them and they are simply being led by oligarch propaganda. And oligarch propaganda will leverage anything that they think will have an impact.

    So how will me rejecting my understanding of genetic bio-chemical reproduction (as is proven by hundreds of millions of years of life on earth and the a reproductive framework that span millions of species) change anything?

    Do you see what I am getting at?


  • I strongly disagree. I am only happy for people to be the best version of themselves and to feel comfortable in their skin.

    Changes in legal or morphological sex is not relevant. This is not what we are discussing.

    I already mentioned that there are edge cases. Edge cases do not discredit foundational frameworks that define reality.

    The bio-chemistry of terrestrial life is built upon a binary sex framework. This has been true for hundreds of millions of years. There is no such things as a triple helix or quadruple helix in terms of reproduction. Even trees and plants have a binary sex.

    You claim that this is something I want to be true. I would argue the same (on a vice versa basis) for you and that you’re framing the discussion using irrelevant examples (how is a morphological change in sex even relevant to what we are discussing).


  • It’s far closer to a binary distribution than a bi-modal distribution. You can be pedantic, but that’s not a real arguement. I admitted there are edge cases.

    This is not tied to pure outcomes and is derived from actual earth bio-chemistry.

    There is no triple helix or quadruple helix as a foundational system of genetic bio-chemical reproduction.

    When you flip a coin, there is a chance that it will land on the side, yet we still use a coin flip for a 50:50 probability scenario because it is close enough.


  • With all due respect, sex is not a spectrum.

    It’s a clearly a binary. Yes, there are many exceptions and edge cases, but they are all based around a universal binary biological structure.

    You don’t have say three distinct sexes required for reproduction outside of sci-fi. It is a binary with some edge cases and variations in how exactly the two parts of the binary interact.


  • and don’t get me started back in the days when every fandom had a dozen sites which all hated each other for vague and extremely personal reasons.

    Oh man, this brings me back.

    Remember the time in the late 90s and early 2000s when even a niche topics had like 3-4 large community sites with active forums. More popular topics could easily have like 10-20 communities.

    And there was a lot of drama both within and between communities.

    It’s kind sad that we lost this, although lemmy is a solid modern alternative, just needs much more users. Enough users for even niche topics to have multiple active communities with their own spin/focus on a given topics.

    On the plus side, I am glad I got to experience the early pre-corporate internet. It was good times.