The only good authoritarian is a dead authoritarian.
Follow me on Mastodon: Unwillingly observing the end of democracy
You don’t need to put the server in the DMZ, just port forward port 80 and 443. Most routers these days ignore all requests to ports that aren’t open. And stick it behind Cloudflare, so you don’t have to expose your IP. Cloudflare also allows you to generate SSL certs that are good for a decade.
Google is the only sure way right now.
You heard it right here on Privacy Guides, ladies and gents!
I’m an anarchist. You know, the kind of person who actually fights for civil rights, while your lot sits at home sipping wine and wondering why the poors are getting so uppity.
You better hope not. Cause if that’s true, then judging from the downvotes you’re getting, people would like something an AI said more than an allegedly intelligent human. But, you swing for the fruit you’re intellectually capable of reaching, I suppose.
Isn’t it brunch time somewhere in the world? Why don’t you go do some sort of performative milquetoast protest and leave the discussion to the adults?
That’s a straw man. I didn’t say the party wasn’t full of fascists, I said not all of them are nazis. Just stop already, you’re embarrassing yourself if you have to invent things I said because you don’t have a good response to what I did say.
That’s the stupidest thing I’ve heard all week, congratulations. You’re insinuating that all Republicans are nazis, for one. It leads me to wonder if you were dropped on you head a little too much as a child. I could go on and point out further problems with your post, but if you’re calling everyone who disagrees with you a nazi, I honestly doubt you’re the sort of person to be willing or able to think critically about what you read, so why bother.
He’s not a nazi sympathizer, stop being ridiculous. And he has never once said he would give your data to the US government, Trump admin or not. You’re just straight up lying.
You and everyone like you are overly dramatic, terminally online chronic posters, making mountains out of molehills because you thrive on controversy and need something new each week to be outraged about.
I can’t imagine all the military and intelligence people that use Threema for casual comms are gonna be happy about this.
That’s childish, petulant nonsense, especially since that would be illegal under Swiss law, even if this law is amended. Not to mention, it isn’t Andy Yen who gets to decide that anyway. It’s the board of directors, of which Tim motherfucking Berners-Lee is a member. You know, father of the World Wide Web.
Ah, I should have guessed that from the quotes, huh? That was my bad.
If you must cross the border, you can always wipe your phone beforehand. Both androids and iPhones can be restored from backups, and it takes an hour at most. They can’t look at your messages if there’s nothing to look at. Likewise, for laptops it’s very simple to store everything either in the cloud, or on a NAS at home, and log out of the VPN before you get on a plane.
Alternatively, you can buy a burner phone for the country you are going to, and have it shipped to you in the US before you leave. This might also be the cheaper option, given that some cell providers can get expensive when you travel abroad.
So your position is that they did something you didn’t like a decade ago, and so that makes them untrustworthy now?
At least you’ve admitted that your argument is nothing more than an opinion.
That’s very good advice. The article you links specifically says “Allegedly” in the title. Let me save you the hassle of getting a dictionary and explain to you the definition of “allegedly”:
used when something is said to be true but has not been proved [source]
The article not only does not provide proof, but it admits that it does not provide it. You, however, continue to insist it does because you want it to be true.
Then you didn’t read it very good, if you not only missed the fact the article was alleging Proton was hacked by Israel, as well as believe it provides proof of that claim when it does not.
No, the post is a conspiracy theory that gives no evidence to support the claim. You can’t use an allegation as evidence to support your allegation, that’s circular logic.
Now the “Switzerland” based privacy firm is proxied by an Israeli firm for traffic analysis, network exploitation of users, cryptographic monkeying
It literally claims that the traffic was routed expressly for the purpose. You didn’t read the article.
It should be noted everywhere that this person posts this, that this is an allegation without any actual evidence to support it.
No, you provided a conspiracy theory that fit your explicit biases. If you had bothered to actually read the link you provided, you would know they didn’t provide any evidence to support their claim that Israel is hacking Proton.
Yeah, it’s a huge PITA to just, you know, click the button to generate a new cert and revoke the old one.