If they aren’t concerned about it then they aren’t paying attention.

When he used both arguments in the same conversation. I shrugged and stopped talking. Nothing to gain by continuing the conversation

Toss up : a coworker who I would have counted as quite intelligent said we haven’t been to the moon because “it’s impossible to launch a rocket to the moon and land on it because rockets go in a straight line. Trying to time the shot of the rocket, and get to the moon at the exact moment when the moon gets to the right spot would be astronomically impossible. The odds of pulling that off at the speed you would be traveling and the distance you travel… Well the odds are effectively zero.”

"Also you can’t catch up to the moon because the moon is traveling faster then our rockets can go "

Either that or a prochoice individual who voted for Trump…

I love the errors you get and the timing of the errors

Good thought but limited number of characters

Edge of if I can.

There are always dead zones or lower power zones in a microwave. As the tray goes back and forth it turns around in circles it takes care if the problem. By going in and out of the zones.

Basically write a name on a piece of paper and then they die. You can also choose the manner of their death if I remember right

You got a few downvotes for speaking the truth.

I’m over 50 I’ve had numerous jobs and I’ve never had a job where the people at that workplace would wanna hear my political opinions. It’s understood you keep your politics out of the workplace. If that means you have no respect for me well so be it. But no one wants to hear your opinion at the workplace and no one wants to hear mine the workplace.

Maybe in your country it’s acceptable, but I’ve had jobs throughout a number of states in the US never had a job where it was acceptable.

As for freedom of speech. Yeah your freedom of speech only applies to what the government can do about you saying something.

Has nothing to do with how your coworkers view you or treat you.

What does iskaied mean

I use wix.com

Not necessarily.

Think of it this way. A graphic designer should get paid each time they create something and each time it is used, or they get paid a LOT for creating it then it is used as much as the new owner wants. We are seeing cases where someone creates something, gets paid a small amount then it’s stolen after that.

Designers can’t stay in business

Think of the person that spends money to create a song, the song has one person who buys it for $1 (normal customer) then everyone else illegally downloads it. Can the artist stay in business? Can the artist afford to continue making music?

It the graphic designer has their stuff stolen, put into ai and people use the work to create other works. The designer is now going to have to charge an insane amount to create other works. Now the cost to hire a designer is so high that many people just settle for ai.

If you hire a graphic designer to create something for you, presumably you pay them.

With ai, someone took their creations and trained the ai to create images and didn’t pay them.

So yeah there’s a difference.

What would you say if your work was used in ai and no one would pay you for your work?

If it is for personal usage, I don’t mind and I don’t care. If it is just for putting on like an AI fan site.Where somebody created an image of a dragon sitting on top of a castle with knights running around, I don’t care I have no problem.

But if it’s used in movies and it is taking jobs away from people that I care. If it’s used in music and it is jobs away from people that I care. If it’s used in art or anything else, and it is taking jobs away from people then I care.

I don’t want to see computer created stuff. I wanna see what humans come up with. It’s also why in movies I prefer practical effects over special effects.

Companies will always go for the cheapest way to do something, but at some point, we’re not gonna have enough jobs. The company won’t care they’re still making money off of somebody.

When we went from horse and buggy a car, the people who made the horse and buggy could take their skills to go build a car because some of the ideas transferred over.

If we keep giving the jobs to AI , where people going to go for jobs?

I want to see what people created with their own hands. Not have a person just type some keywords into a computer and have the computer just generate something.

Either 1 or 3. I tend to lean towards 3