Voting/speaking against fascism
Voting/speaking against fascism
No one answered why, not even OP.
“I think so but I got distracted after the first 20 seconds.”
I still use matrix when I want to do complicated searches. Google bought it years ago and incorporated its feeds into google flights. Try the advanced options: https://matrix.itasoftware.com/search
Your prof curved to the third quartile. Interesting.
Are you trying to pass an amendment? They actually had a supermajority for 72 days. Not that they didn’t get anything done, mind you, but the point stands.
Obama had a majority too. The problem is too many members rowing in different directions within the party.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress
I learned from the new Dexter show that you have to kill three times to become a serial killer. So, it seems like two is the optimum number here, reducing the number of murderers by one and increasing the number of serial killers by none.
Russia is interested in peace as long as it gets to dictate the terms, and install its own people in the new Russian territory.
We’re asking you to vote NO in the upcoming Board election to hold REI accountable for all their recent behavior. Read on to learn more about all the ways REI is losing sight of itself, failing its members and workers, and jeopardizing its founding principles.
REI endorses Trump’s pick for Secretary of the Interior
REI’s leadership recently endorsed Doug Burgum, Trump’s pick to lead the Department of the Interior. Since joining Trump’s cabinet, Burgum has already pushed for:
More oil and gas drilling on public land.
A reversal of “harmful” and “coercive” Biden-era climate protections.
Reduced accountability for mining companies that harm wildlife.
A revision of public land protections, which could change the boundaries of our national monuments.
*To be considered an “active” member and entitled to vote, a member must have purchased at least $10 worth of merchandise, had a shipping charge of at least $10, or become a new member in 2024.
This data only seems to cover part 121 and part 135 fatalities. In 2012, that was 9.
https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/data/Pages/2012-Avaiation-Accident-Summary.aspx
Assuming we can trust a .gov site’s data.
That statement could mean so many things.
Why bother adding imagery to this post?
Why bother searching for a gif specifically when a jpg would have done?
Why bother making, what could have worked fine as a simple static image, into a gif?
So did you know you’re in an adhd forum? I had to do everything in my power not to answer the first option I thought of.
But its still the weeke… Oh shit!
Google now thinks:
A) You’re a pengin
B) You’re trying to marry up from your social class
Your ads are going to be wonderful.
This explanation makes no sense in the context of OP’s question, given the order of comments…
I like that growth mindset!