- 5 Posts
- 7 Comments
This statement is at least twofold:
1 - it says “I do not have to debate to ensure I have basic human rights”, a statement that is clearly true in every instance.
2 - it is a reaction to bad-faith “debating” used as an attack tactic by oppressors; read up on sealioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
Combine those two facts, and you have people weaponizing “I’m just debating” to keep someone in an unending treadmill of debate where they constantly have to try to prove they deserve basic human rights. It’s actually hell.
Good faith debate and discourse on all key topics the media/gov pushes on us right now has been long settled, none of it is new, so someone actually willing to learn can just search “do trans people deserve basic human rights” or “can minorities be discriminated against by systemic factors” and there’s already robust answers that should not shock you!
No need to make a trans person make a case over and over again that they deserve to live or a Palestinian make a case that the system within which they live is an open-air jail. And that is what this person is saying.
How does doggo do it?? The accuracy to within +/-3 days always, seriously impressive
Commutin from my bed to the couch, stuck in traffic in the hall filled with laundry😭😭 fucking cat cut me off. almost crashed into the vacuum under a pile of shirts gdi “use a turn signal you feline” I yell as the cat claws-out zooms by. Commuting is fucking stressful omg
Cut my triangle into slices, this is my last resort
Horizontal, no perpendicular
Don’t give a fuck if I can add the three axes to 100
This is my last resort (to read this graph)
~So you follow the flesh axis, and the horizontal lines coming from the flesh axis are the flesh axis values. It works the same for the other axes, they just won’t be horizontal in this view. For example, one of the intersections in the “human” region is 40% flesh, 10% divine, 50% machine - you did it right if it totals 100%!
As another example, one of the intersection points for Sandy Loam is 10% flesh, 30% divine, and 60% machine. I fear Sandy Loam has evolved far past us and is pulling the strings on the global cabal, based on that measurement.
Now you know how to read an obtuse ternary plot!
There’s so much Sandy has to answer for
Glorious