You don’t have to do the same job the whole time?

One of the major reasons I became self employed instead

Other countries exist? 🤯

Any computer with HDMI output?

HTMX might be appropriate for your usecase

May your kleenex always be nearby

Allergies?

accident theory

It was just a navigation error?

I used to buy pokemon cards as a kid

I think webassembly will come out on top as preferred runtime because of this, and the sandboxing.

They can be ignored by individuals

deleted by creator

Number of testicles

Could they be software engineer bones?

Those quotes are saying the same thing: no dominating strategy emerges. Neither full defection, nor full cooperation. It oscillates.

That’s like saying poker is a solved game if you can view eachothers cards :D

I assumed it was obvious that it would remain a game where full knowledge of the game state is never granted to a participant. And the variant you proposed just added a communication channel.

That’s to say: it stays realistic.

If the prisoners can communicate, they will know that the other prisoner didn’t talk

They do not, as lying exists

only a dilemma when it is played in only one round.

There is no fixed solution for the repeated case:

in such a simulation, tit-for-tat will almost always come to dominate, though nasty strategies will drift in and out of the population because a tit-for-tat population is penetrable by non-retaliating nice strategies, which in turn are easy prey for the nasty strategies. Dawkins showed that here, no static mix of strategies forms a stable equilibrium, and the system will always oscillate between bounds

(1)

If you allow information to flow between them it’s literally not a dilemma any more.

That’s novel information. Where did you learn that?

Believe it or not, this is not a necessity of human nature. It’s just your society that’s fucked up.

Do you look at the prisoner’s dilemma and conclude that cooperation is the obvious answer?