OK, we can compromise and keep your index finger and thumb nail. But they grow at 1/10 the speed.

Nails. I think we could go without nails. Specially toe nails. Finger nails could be an optional add on.

I don’t mind shitting, it feels good. We could probably absorb more of it so we have less shit to do? Seems so inefficient.

Ice age is not a planet or life destroying event.

If you blow up all our nukes in the same place at once, you will make a bill hole and a hell lotta dust, but you certainly won’t destroy the planet or kill all life. In that case you might dessimate a lot of large animal and plant species. But there would still be survivors, probably including humans. Their lives would probably be miserable for a long time too. But anyway, we’re talking about climate change, not nukes, so I don’t get why you’re bringing that up?

I guess there are no stupid questions, but there are stupid people.

I love working with competent QA engineers. It’s always a humbling experience.

It’s not though. You an I would probably die if your civilization collapses, but millions of people live away from civilization. Humans will definitely survive this, but many modern societies won’t.

Yes, I know. I think it’s definitely game over for that much, but I want to expand that the game goes on much longer.

No, it’s not “game over”. It will never be game over. Humans do not have the ability to destroy the planet.

What we do have is the ability of making it hard for lots of regions to sustain complex biodiversity and human activity. The more and the faster the average global temperature increases, the more people will be displaced and biodiversity lost.

Nature will always bounce back because nature operates in geological scale. But human civilization will suffer a lot. Vast areas will be progressively destroyed by droughts, floods, fires and encroaching sea, which will continue increasing migration to safer places, causing more and more unrest and war.

So, yeah. Never game over, just progressively crappier levels.

They purposely casted controversial actors hoping to get free publicity - Hollywood’s new favourite marketing ploy is outrage casting. But this time it didn’t pay off.

The linter runs automatically on every commit and blocks merges if it fails. Try again

Love all the details. Impressive interiors.

Or even just a programmer that decides not to work for FAANG or whatever the acronym is now, and not use their skills for evil.

Resisting the urge to downvoted because this is a great question for this sub.

A lot of it is historical and never changed for 100+ years. Same reason buttons are on opposite sides on men and women garments.

Sometimes a simpler solution solves 99% of the problem for 50% of the effort and the client is happy.

Several Favicon APIs do this. Even Google’s Favicon endpoint does it, because they return a fallback image. It’s pretty annoying.

That or because you’re like a baby whining about little emoji. Self fulfilling profecy. (I’m kidding)

Surprised he’s not dismantling the whole of NASA

Yes, but then I have to buy one.

How else would it work?