• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldFreedom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Eh, I’ve previously fucked up my bootloader, all you need to do to fix it is boot up a live image, mount your root partition, arch-chroot into it, then follow normal steps to set the bootloader back up - it’s not scary if you know what you’re doing, just time-consuming





  • I’m not sure if this is what you mean, but I do want to clarify - the drivers in the repository are still proprietary drivers from Nvidia, just tested and packaged by the distribution maintainers, dkms is just some magic that lets them work with arbitrary kernels with minimal compilation. Unless you’re using nouveau, which I don’t think is ready for most uses.


  • I’d definitely recommend against using drivers downloaded from a website, on general principles.

    custom kernels don’t work with the drivers from apt

    Check if there’s a dkms version - I know that’s the way it’s set up on Arch, if using a non-standard kernel you install the kernel headers, and dkms lets you build just the module for your kernel.



  • Funnily enough, I’ve seen opinions that Windows has awful HDR handling and Plasma is much better, but I don’t have a proper HDR display to check. I’ve also had some success with VR, though I haven’t played much on Linux. That said, support from software for those things for Linux is still widely lacking, so it’s not much consolation.





  • their acceptable use policy straight up forbids viewing pornography or graphic violence

    That’s one thing I’m unsure about, because at the very top of the acceptable use policy it says that those points apply to Mozilla services - is Firefox a service, or does it only apply to online services that are built into Firefox?

    I still don’t like it if it’s overreaching, but I could understand if they don’t want, say, porn on some sharing features where they might be hosting something.



  • Archlinux is good if you accept that you’ll need to spend time to learn it, and that those moments might be frequent and unavoidable early on. Definitely wouldn’t recommend it to somebody who needs their computer to work, since a new user with no experience might find themselves breaking their boot images and spending hours trying to figure out how to fix their computer not booting.

    So yeah, I think that’s an important caveat: if you don’t know Linux already, and you can’t afford to spend time learning and fixing your system, don’t use Arch.