After an episode of The IT Crowd was criticised as transphobic, Linehan became involved in anti-transgender activism. He argues that transgender activism endangers women, and has likened the use of puberty blockers to Nazi eugenics. Linehan says his views have lost him work and ended his marriage
your options are shite and I refuse them all is a valid vote, why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?
The only way that’s communicated is by officially declining the ballot. And I agree with the other commenter that it should be easier to do this.
By not voting, you’re communicating “They’re all fine; I can’t be assed to pick”.
Amazing find and well worth the read!
You don’t actually have to fill out the ballot. You can tell the voting officer that you decline it, you can write profanity on it, or you can vote for your dog.
It’s a minor civic duty. Much less onerous than jury duty, lol
I pay $27.12 (taxes in) for more data than I need per month (~12GB). Grandfathered Freedom Mobile plan.
Yes. There’s the .ml instance. If they’re from there, they are a troll!
/kidding
Wouldn’t it be better if you started a year early so you can give him a heads-up on everything when he starts the next year?
This way you can put your boyfriend first and yourself first. Seems like a win-win to me.
Unless you’re wanting to do this because of some other underlying issue that you haven’t disclosed (risk of jealousy? Anxious attachment style?).
Be good to those you meet on your way to the top because you never know who you’ll see again during your fall to the bottom.
Heard this and it stuck with me. Not because I was “mean”, but it’s just a good perspective on why even someone utilitarian (or psychopathic) should be nice.
What if (god forbid) she lost her beauty? What if one of the people she was mean to attacked her face causing permanent damage? The others will remember that she was mean to her and show her no sympathy.
Big dogs shouldn’t eat small dogs. They should protect them.
“Brian”…?
Typo/autocorrect for “bran”?
It’s a great word. It can be almost any part of speech/grammar!
14 isn’t old, it’s not even legal age to buy cigarettes.
I’ll do some weird math.
The first computer game could be argued to have been released in 1950, and the first commercial video game was released in 1971. Let’s call it either 70 or 50 years ago.
14 years is 20~28% of the entire history of video games.
The first feature film came out in 1906; let’s call it 120 years old. So let’s calculate what 20~28% of this history of film is.
20% of 120 years is 24 years, and 28% is 33.6, rounded to 34.
So if you compare them by the “commercial video game vs. feature film” definition, a 14-year old game is like Beauty and the Beast, Hangin’ with the Homeboys, or Showdown in Little Tokyo.
If you want to use the “youngest” ratio, then we can compare Skyrim to films that are just 24 years old, like Shrek, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within, or Spy Kids.
I dunno, I think 14 years old is an old game! Haha
What is a Personal Pronoun?
A whole bunch of angry Americans would fail to answer that question correctly these days…
Doesn’t this kind of depend on where you live? Lol
laws
Damages
guilty
morally convict
crime
…lol
What are you going on about?
The reason I kept showing you the same comment is because you said things like “I’m deeply confused” and asking me what I’m saying.
I’m not even arguing with you. But you seem to be putting a lot of effort into reading an argument into what I’m saying. Is this how you enjoy spending your time on social media? Lol
Why do you keep using words like “accuse” and “guilty”? Lol
Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.
This is what I’m saying. I’m not even sure why you seem to be trying to make this a fight or an argument or something. “Tire you out”? Lol
“But I haven’t seen you in over a decade!”
I said, SAME. OLD!
I’m asking you to clearly formulate what it is that you’re accusing Nintendo of.
For the third time…
Nintendo benefitted financially from piracy and made no efforts to hide the fact that they obtained games through the exact same methods that pirates use.
Which part is unclear to you? Lol
Source, in case you’re unfamiliar with this funny thing they did
What are you confused about?
I don’t understand what your angle is. It feels like you’re really trying to win an argument, except you seem to be the only one arguing.
I’ve been trying to sort out a misunderstanding, and it looks like you’re trying to win something. The misunderstanding is sorted out. So, I guess you win, too?
… you’re looking for what? Lol