[…] smash epic beasts

you picked a very lenient verb to designate whatever actions you’re going to inflict on the monsters

I want to commend you for some sort of prize. I can’t upvote twice but I would if I could. Nice!

p.s

I’m going to take a risk and say the comparison to fawns implies not very big breast but well defined and not very much parted.

Physical media won’t die until digital rights actually represents ownership.

I was aiming my remark on this particular passage.

I understand your take, I respect it, but even when that is true, regarding digital rights, I will still want all my media in my house, in a machine I own, instead of having it stored in a server somewhere.

I understand your point of view but nonetheless I want my media in my hous, no matter what form it takes.

I don’t want my media in a computer I do not own.

I’m looking for the rats!

If I lived close to this person, I’d offer to go to their house and redo those doors and walls. Nasty looking.

Too much information.

Already use it and recommend it. Simple and light. In fact, go for the entire ecosystem if you need ligh weight alternatives to GAPPS

To paraphrase an answer I once read: yes, we tend to introduce warnings against bad behaviours we detect and deprecate obsolete information.

In this case: I don’t need to tinker a valve in an engine nowadays. The fuel injection is done through an incredibly precise system, controlled by a computer. Even mechanics require specialized tools and equipments to fiddle with that part of an engine.

Car batteries have been built more and more to be maintenance-less; you buy it, run, when it dies you replace it and that is it. Battery acid is a thing and it is dangerous, hence the attempt to divert people from messing with it.

But because less and less people are prone to go into mechanics, the need to advise against tinkering with your battery really needs to be reinforced.

Warning labels are often first written in blood before taking form of paper and ink.

Yes. It is called “obcession”.