This is such a bug to get unix people riled… Literally 99% people plugging the USB stick in are doing it to actually install the OS.
The 1% that isn’t also know how to clean the list afterwards.
Yeah the bug sucks ass, but complaining about going forward with the release with such a minor edge case is what I fucking hate about the community.
I’m pretty sure this was sarcasm, but last I checked the society means men liking men as gay, and women liking women lesbian.
I’m aware they all are gay, but for real, my message was joke and I don’t really think it could be misunderstood.
For anyone that might have misunderstood, the overly misogynistic joke was that straight men and lesbians know what it’s like to date women. Gay men don’t, and that’s why they are so happy and cheerful.
And no, I’m not serious, nor share the sentiment. It’s a joke. And yes, we can joke about anything.
They also have more in common with you than any gay person ever will.
In a perfect world the UI would be customizable to the extent that I feel at home and don’t need to unlearn and relearn patterns ingrained in my brain. For me those patterns are very relevant as I work in the field and every time the tools force me to spend more time working around them instead of with them, lead to loss of efficiency.
Extension support exists in some Chrome based browsers, too. Kiwi Browser also comes to mind.
Remote debugging is also important to me, and even though you can install Chrome dev tools in Firefox, it doesn’t work with remote debugging.
Like i said earliier, im a web dev, and that’s a list of web standards, and a comparison which browser has implemented which spec.
You literally said you don’t understand them, so maybe brush up on the subject you are discussing instead of telling others how things are?
I’m not defending anything, just providing info and saying why I use what I use.
If a browser is missing official standards features, then the browser is objectively lagging behind. Yes, the web devs are at fault for using things that lack wider support, but that comes down to many factors such as having the time and money to implement things in a more complex manner to support more browsers. That’s not always feasible or possible if a certain core feature lets us save hours or days.
I find this weird, as I’ve seen trans and lqbtq ads in brave befofe disabling ads. I checked Eich out now, is the whole controversy really just due a 1000$ donation to a christian group (which had anti gay agendas among other things)?
I’m honestly just a bit baffled, might be I’m just very out of the loop.
Websites would use more things more liberally if support didn’t lag behind. Used to be that Safari was the new IE9 in that aspect, but Firefox has gradually been getting behind past few years.
https://caniuse.com/?compare=chrome+135%2Cedge+131%2Csafari+18.3%2Cfirefox+137&compareCats=all
No extension support sadly, I still have it as my secondary on desktop.
I’m blaming a browser that hasn’t implemented as many standards as it’s competitors, and choosing therefore to use a free car that runs well on said roads.
Could you explain how that logic works? I don’t support their CEOs points of views by simply browsing the web with the app.
I can understand how mentioning this, I would, but I was compelled to reply to your question.
Edit: Naos question*
Edit 2: I don’t see Cromite in the app store, and have near zero will for tinkering/manual updating after a days work in tech.
Haven’t found anything on Android to replace it with, and on Desktop swapped to it after Chrome Manifest V3.
I work as a web dev, and after the install I just disabled the wallet etc, and am left with a browser with native quick dark mode toggle, built in support for ublock lists, and otherwise familiar Chrome experience, with full extension support and foldable device support.
Firefox has certain UI/UX choices I dislike, and they are behind in implementing lots of features (that are rarely an issue to non devs).
Otherwise I agree with you, but a bug thats been tracked to be caused by a bad rest api call causing the client to crash is not Apples fault in the slightest.
CIvs have had lots of Mac players, enough so that they keep releasing it on the platform.
In this case, the bug ruined cloud games for our friendgroup that rarely has time for an active session. I’m a PC gamer, but two of us are not.
If they release an advertize a feature, it should function for everyone who purchased the game.
Their lack of commubication and ultimately not fixing it (at first, they said within 6 months - now it’s been nearly 8 years) is the reason me and our group votes with our wallets for what it’s worth.
I’m not buying it. Civ 6 had play by cloud, and this crashes on Mac every time you end your turn.
Despite acknowlidging the bug, years and years later it’s still broken.
Could you read and understand the information behind the link before replying with nonsense?
FYI: there were waterproof phones before replaceable batteries disappeared. Also the Fairphone for example IPS rated for resistant, so not perfect, but it’s possible.
Touch some grass dude. This is not a low prio bug at worst. Anyone “tinkering” will have ended up doing worse, and have had to clean or modify boot records before.
Anyone not tinkering will have carried out with the install, instead of merely live booting Fedora.