I don’t think ‘don’t commit war crimes’ and ‘don’t commit genocide’ are impossible standards. And NATO’s far right allies in Ukraine are literally drawing swastikas on every missile.
https://www.modernghana.com/news/1159475/you-should-know-about-the-war-crimes-of-nato-and.amp
NATO is a fascist organization. No, I don’t think a person who supports Ukrainians being ruled by a far-right puppet government, installed by the US, opposes fascism.
Just a bunch pro-fascist NATO talking points. That lines up. You don’t oppose fascism. You just have a preferred flavor of it.
Genocide is not a “single issue.” For genocide to be allowed to happen, there has to be a mountain of other issues.
You are a disgusting person for hand waving genocide like this. You should be ashamed of yourself.
There’s always just enough Democrats.
That’s just an accidental admission that you supported the Democrats because of what you had to lose. You didn’t notice the one who had already lost everything.
To wave off their active participation and material support as “lack of resistance” makes it clear you’re either pushing an agenda, or are simply gullible.
And the Dems are voting to approve the appointments and policies, and helping to fund these actions. But again, you seem to have some tunnel vision on what the media is feeding you, so I wouldn’t be surprised if you legit didn’t know the Dems were part of this operation.
K. I’m done arguing against your support for fascism by you excusing it with edge cases and strawmen. Blocked.
It is dishonest to claim the scale of the harm is different under Democrats than Republicans. Rather, it is the media attention paid to the harm that is most changed.
I am sick of this madness, pretending that a bomb dropped or a service cut or a person deported by a Democrat vs a Republican is in any way ‘harm reduction.’
Voting for Dems is not saying ‘I don’t want anyone else to get hurt,’ as you claim they were arguing. If you look at the actual comment, they’re just saying it would be done in a different way. They quite pointedly did not imply Dems would not hurt anyone.
A good description for constitutional rights, which have minimal if any limitations on them. Your edge cases don’t change that.
Yes, constitutional rights have to be crafted for most general scenarios.
So now opposing both parties is supporting genocide? This is one of the laziest astroturf/hasbara bots I’ve seen on here yet.
People are perfectly capable of opposing Democrats and Trump.
LoL. Sure bud.
Do you know what a strawman or edge case is?
That’s not their argument. If you have to misconstrue, you know you’re wrong.
No. Same amount.
I can give as many more examples as you would like. This isn’t an isolated incident. This is business as usual.