Fun fact this is how I learned a coworker pegged her husband. He wasn’t gay, but had no interest in topping her either. C’est la vie.

I took can make up fanciful ideas that don’t pass the smell test.

ROCm certainly has gotten better, but the weird edge cases remain; alongside the fact that merely getting certain models to run is problematic. I am hoping that RNDA4 is paired with some tooling improvements. No more massive custom container builds, no more versioning nightmares. At my last startup we tried very hard to get AMD GPUs to work, but there were too many issues.

Unfortunately getting an AI workload to run on those XTXs, and run correctly, is another story entirely.

My plan is to wait a few months for the software quality to mature, then migrate from my Deck to this one.

Yup, $100 too much and I get what out of it? I have a 12 Pro and there hasn’t been a single compelling feature in the past 3 generations.

Start job hunting now. By the sound of it they are one of those PE firms that zombie walk every acquisition into mediocrity.

Ultimately Linus’ opinion here does not matter in the positive. He can say Rust in kernel is good, but that does not summon the skill and work to make it happen. He can say it’s bad and quash it, at the potential expense of Linux’s future. His position of avoiding an extreme is a pragmatic one. “Let them come if they may, and if they do not it was less a loss for us.”

Fact is Rust isn’t ready for every part of the kernel. C/Rust interop is still a growing pain for Linux and troubleshooting issues at the boundary require a developer to be good at both. It’s an uphill battle, and instead of inciting flame wars they could have fostered cooperation around the parts of the kernel that were more prepared. While their work is appreciated and they are incredibly talented, the reality is that social pressures are going to dictate development. At the end of the day software is used by people. Their expectations are not law, but they do need addressed to preserve public opinion.

There are actually a few tools that crawl job sites and can auto submit your resume already. Predictably, there was a lot of complaining about it. With agentic tools maturing, it won’t be long before you can just give AI your resume and have it trawl the job sites and apply to relevant jobs. They will have reaped what they sowed.

Rigatoni you are my favorite shitposter on lemmy, but they do not like trolls on beehaw.

From the article:

Samsung has informed MacRumors that the original report from The Elec is “completely incorrect” and that the “details are false.” While The Elec has pulled its report entirely, we are leaving our original article intact below for reference to ensure clarity around the situation.

It didn’t pass the sniff test when it was originally published either. The UMA is the largest contributor to the M series’ AI performance. The fact they published it at all is damning.

Can we get a bot or rule to ban this clickbait website from being posted?

Apple has been criticized for its recent naming scheme because it was the kind of complexity that Steve worked against. They clearly copied the names in a “death by committee” fashion with a total ignorance as to why they shouldn’t be copied. The recent naming scheme is clearly a mistake, and no one with a pulse on the market would say otherwise.