Castle and stand your ground laws also apply to you shooting police who do not properly identify themselves. Even more applicable in this scenario.

Kanye would agree

4chan funded their own dating app. It was alright.

I don’t think the antisemites would support them.

Depends on the gun buyback program. Most have a clause for rare and historic finds to be donated.

I just described money…

Maybe we should all specialize, and pay each other with our own goods, or better yet, a sort of representation of goods we all agree is valuable, so you can get one persons goods with anothers.

In the end all that changes is a Saudi company on NSA checks instead of a US one.

I use standard Firefox, how do i set those to false? Are they settings?

Which browsers don’t?

The second option

https://youtu.be/s8hEtI9AI0U

I bought all the rainbow six games in a bundle just to play Vegas, got to Vegas 2 maybe a year ago. I might get through the other 5 over the next 20 years.

Mine does not display it like that, I have it set to a larger print though, and the full display name and the @ appears.

To accomodate different instances and different infrastructure I would assume. My app lets me turn the display name and the profile picture on and off, but again the size of the photo and the dual display name and @ takes up a lot of screen space and it’s easier to have them off.

My app, and clearly a lot of mobile apps, show the @, which is like the legal name, so [email protected], it does not show the account display name, which is Katy, until I click on the profile. This is most likely due to screen size and for readability. Same with the profile picture, do not see it until I click on the profile.

Exception? You mean the standard.

9/11 deaths are usually not counted, but even when counted the spike is not as noticeable as you might think. This graph shows data without 9/11, add 265 for the passengers and crew of the 4 planes. I think this graph is also the entire world and not just the USA.

I believe the answer can be broken into three parts:

1. valid criticism, when a movie is genuinely bad and has a female lead, the valid criticisms of the film are overdhadowed by slop online articles criticizing fans for not supporting women and hating a female lead. Captain Marvel is a good example of this. The movie has genuine issues, and is not considered a good Marvel movie, but the overall online discussion focused around Marvel fans not supporting a female lead superhero movie, when Wonder Woman found success and Captain America: The Winter Soldier is arguably colead by Scarlett Johanson.

2. Pre box office reactions. Any movie which can be summed up as “X but with women” lands here. Same with any movie which intentionally admonishes the male audience and advertises itself as for women and only, then get mad men didn’t see the movie. Charlie’s Angels, Ghostbusters, and Captain Marvel fall into this category.

3. Genuine oddities and sexism. I believe this applies to the gaming industry more than the film indistry, but it can blead over. I believe the initial outrage over _The Marvels _ was this, but the movie ended up having major issues and went to category 1.

We will know so far ahead of time if something happens, it is as if nothing happened at all.