db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 days agoTaps the sign...lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1481
arrow-up1481imageTaps the sign...lemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 days agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareNelots@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-25 days ago Being straight will always BE the default. It’s a requirement for the survival of the species. Three different arguments against that: Why wouldn’t bi people be the “default”? Who says the survival of the species needs to be the standard by which we decide what is default? You’re ignoring technology like artificial wombs. Assuming technology continues to advance, I could see the population thriving even if 100% were gay.
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days ago very rare in other species to have predominantly bi populations pointing to lower evolutionary advantages semantics, default is the expected state doesn’t exist and won’t change the evolutionary pressures for a predominantly heterosexual population
Three different arguments against that:
Why wouldn’t bi people be the “default”?
Who says the survival of the species needs to be the standard by which we decide what is default?
You’re ignoring technology like artificial wombs. Assuming technology continues to advance, I could see the population thriving even if 100% were gay.