The plague of NIMBY’s may yield if a real plan is put in place to rebuild better. Vast areas could be rezoned for density. A way of addressing the enormous number of displaced people could also address the largest homeless population in the USA. The city that defines urban sprawl could be redefined. How does this play out?
What do you think it means when a group fails to have any substance in conversation, cannot deal with current subjects, or reacts negatively at basic complexity presented as a casual discussion in an attempt to create discourse with diverse opinions?
Locking the topic as it doesn’t fit the second rule, as well as based on the negative score.
Feel free to ask this question again on [email protected] or other non-casual communities, there are plenty of them on Lemmy. Feel free to DM me on Matrix if you want to discuss this decision.
Those are three accusatory, loaded, and unfounded questions and pretty fuckin rude
It is a response in the exact same tone I read, and this is exactly how In felt as well. I’m glad that point was clearly made. I did not start that.
I mean he’s right- nothing about your tone or conversation anywhere here is casual and light. Like what the community is for