“email is inherently insecure, email can never be secure, it leaks a LOT of metadata and only the body is encrypted, subject can NOT be encrypted, you can NOT build a secure system on top of email”

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Question: why not use a protocol built and strengthened around secure chatting specifically?

    Why not SimpleX or signal?

    • adbenitez@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      it is all about the sassy retro style and base64 MIME body

      more seriously: Signal is centralized and based on phone numbers, and as said by Signal themselves: “Privacy is Priceless, but Signal is Expensive” https://signal.org/blog/signal-is-expensive/ while email infra is WAY more economic and decentralized

      SimpleX maybe but I it is not powerful/flexible nor as solid/mature as email server infra

      • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I see, thank you. I think delta is audited too so it’s pretty solid.

        Though, if you advertised delta/arcane directly instead of a meme, people might not have been so angry haha. You’re free to make a post about them but please do cite the audit :)

        • adbenitez@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I didn’t want to advice/promote DeltaChat/ArcaneChat, they are not the only possible way of using email securely, just came here with the meme as a way of leaving out a rant because I have seen a lot of people talking like that and it is by now an urban legend people just repeat like parrots and pointing to articles that basically are misleading. Had a recent discussion about that in the Privacy Guides forum and just came here with the meme to shake the frustration away ;-)

          • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah i checked that thread, that user that kept bickering seemed like an asshole, sorry. I think delta/arcane is pretty novel and noble.

            Standard OpenPGP e-mail encryption protects message contents, but not message headers such as From, To and Subject fields. To protect Subject header Delta Chat and other email clients such as Thunderbird and K-9 Mail replace Subject with “…” or “Encrypted Message” and place real Subject into the encrypted part of an e-mail message

            Clearly they didn’t even read the audit 🤦‍♂️ Thanks for your good work, btw :D

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Matrix could be a good solution, though that only works if the services actually support it for activation and verification.

      Which ultimately is the problem with any alternative to email, they need to be supported by other services to be any useful.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah this is the guy who has been plugging it. It’s not that I don’t like it, but I don’t like the use of the email protocols being used in that ways it wasn’t meant for. Its also yet another standard when we already have a few, keeping people separate