Misinformation is widespread, but only some people fall for the false information they encounter. This raises two questions: Who falls for misinformation, and why do they fall for misinformation? To address these questions, two studies investigated associations between 15 individual-difference dimensions and judgments of misinformation as true. Using Signal Detection Theory, the studies further investigated whether the obtained associations are driven by individual differences in truth sensitivity, acceptance threshold, or myside bias. For both political misinformation (Study 1) and misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines (Study 2), truth sensitivity was positively associated with cognitive reflection and actively open-minded thinking, and negatively associated with bullshit receptivity and conspiracy mentality. Although acceptance threshold and myside bias explained considerable variance in judgments of misinformation as true, neither showed robust associations with the measured individual-difference dimensions. The findings provide deeper insights into individual differences in misinformation susceptibility and uncover critical gaps in their scientific understanding.

    • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I prefer his full name: “The Father of Behavioral Economics, the Great Danny Kahneman,PhD and his lifelong co-collaborator, Amos Tversky.”

      Sorry. He gets mentioned so often in the podcasts I listen to, all that is queued up in my brain upon hearing his name. There is literally a drinking game based on how often he is mentioned.