• nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is a part of a broader thesis, which also argues the ‘comfortable subsistence’ should be treated as a right.

    The taxation wouldn’t be required to pay for anything, its primary purpose is to constrain inequality, and incentivise continual elevation of the social floor.

    I’d like to see ‘wealth’ accumulation and persistence as a legitimate proxy of how much someone has contributed to and supported the society they participate within, as opposed to its current form of how much they’ve extracted from and damaged it.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They can build their reputation, and be happy with it. Individualism is a lie to justify unequal distribution of resources.

      Show me someone born on a deserted island, who built their entire world and infrastructure from the ground up as an individual, and you’ll have a case for someone who deserves all that they’ve built. For the rest of us, we are a species that builds on the works of all others who came before, and we succeed together.

      The singular genius myth is a lie built to justify a race to the patent office, and dismiss multiple discovery.