https://lemmy.world/comment/14391879

Please no brigading, I’m only linking for context.

Criticising the OP for being spiteful by saying “Served them right!” in the post when lack of customers resulted in menu changes, which still failed to save the restaurant is hardly “excusing carnism” or being a “fake vegan” in my opinion.

“fake vegan” isn’t in the rules anywhere either? Odd really.

Failing to celebrate the closure of a (formerly) vegan restaurant due to lack of customers hardly sounds like ‘carnist rhetoric’ (rule 5) to me but what do I know.

  • Cypher@lemmy.worldOP
    6·
    2 days ago

    Apologies I missed that one.

    I guess Im more asking people’s verdict on my particular ban

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      10·
      2 days ago

      It’s indeed exactly the same comments. I was banned along with you and posted it back then. In the other thread also Sunshine (the mod) responded but doubled down on her decision.

      I find it very unfortunate that [email protected] apparantly doesn’t allow for debates but I guess that’s in the end the decision of the mods.

    • oceanAEnglish
      4·
      2 days ago

      The ban definitely seems unnecessary

      • Cypher@lemmy.worldOP
        2·
        2 days ago

        I didn’t feel the need to check if my ban had already been discussed so didn’t know about that post until after posting.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      1·
      2 days ago

      While I disagree with corpo speak, bans like that don’t make much sense.

      Just block the place and move on. That’s the fedi way.