• insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    just introduce new users to GNOME, that’s perfectly intuitive and even looks great!

    Gnome 2 sure, modern not so much. I mean when useful features are cut from the GUI it just means it’s harder to actually do things. Like removing “open in terminal” made non-GUI stuff more difficult (esp. w/complicated directory).

    I’d say XFCE or Cinnamon or anything else like those are better.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      What’s wrong with Gnome Shell? It looks very sleak and modern albeit really hard to customise.

      • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I guess I would boil it down to: I’m not using Linux on a touchscreen and am unlikely to any time soon. I’m not even sure if/when I’ll ever go beyond 1080p (and a small screen at that) because cost.

        I don’t want a dock or full-screen apps menu. I don’t want to fix those (or missing features) using extensions. I do want to customize things*, but otherwise I don’t need my desktop to look new or exciting.

        * I even made my own hyper-minimal XFWM window theme (which is honestly unneeded for maximized applications due to my XFCE settings anyway, but it does allow me to have a rolled-up music player always visible like an old-internet music widget).