It does prevent that and there are multiple kinds of filming. Making a movie and recording someone with my phone are both recording the person, but different laws apply. I have gave you the exact law pointing this out with cases that were won.
At this point you’re not arguing with me, you’re arguing with established court cases and law lol.
😂 you’re just clueless. Literally every store with security cameras puts up a sign on the entrance doors that allows this behavior and there is plenty of case law that supports this. Your wonderful facebook case is a laughably retarded example. Its not even remotely applicable to this conversation.
its a state law which has 0 impact anywhere except Illinois.
its not applicable to the tsa or any state/federal agency (aka public entities) which are explicitly excluded from that law.
nor did it in anyway prevent Facebook from continuing the practice. They just needed to put up a clear and visible notice of the functionality as I explained with the security cameras.
nor did it have anything to do with individuals in public spaces.
finally it was settled for a pittance, probably less than the court case would have cost facebook just in lawyer and engineering labor it would have had ro dedicate to the discovery phase.
Im sorry but reality doesnt jive with your reading of laws. Feel free to get laughed out of court attempting to prove me wrong. Its almost like you just googled ‘facial recognition lawsuits’, grabbed the first case that seemed remotely related to this fantasy in your head and ran with with it.
Until you win that magical court case that doesnt exist, stop wasting mine and everyone else’s time with your drivel.
Lol so you did no research. Do I need to spoon feed you everything? Read the law, you need to understand the difference between recording and owning the rights to something or using it in certain ways. You seem stuck on “STORES HAVE CAMERAS!!1” Ya, I know. Maybe take the time and read the laws instead of just ranting about what you think is legal. Weird that those laws I mentioned even exist of it’s not illegal. Weird that even more laws exist about it. Almost like it’s more complicated than security cameras = everyone owns your image.
Im not stuck on anything. Im simply pointing put the fundamental flaw in your understanding. Your just too dense to grasp it.
Bribery of governmental officials is also illegal, and yet an entire industry exists around it.
The video cameras in stores literally contradict your position that its illegal and yet you hold on to the premise.
The fact facebook just added two lines to their ToS and suddenly their ‘illegal’ behavior was changed to legal demonstrates just how fucking dense you are.
Your issue is you havent yet demonstrated any instances of these laws being upheld in any meaningful manner.
And yet with using grocery stores as a simple example ive entirely dissembled your entire position.
So yes you found a law in a single state, that is entirely ineffectual, doesnt apply to the TSA, and has a ‘this law does not apply’ workaround bigger than the fucking sun for everyone else.
Good job champ, let me introduce you to your need special needs counselor, I’ll leave the rest of your education to them.
It does prevent that and there are multiple kinds of filming. Making a movie and recording someone with my phone are both recording the person, but different laws apply. I have gave you the exact law pointing this out with cases that were won.
At this point you’re not arguing with me, you’re arguing with established court cases and law lol.
😂 you’re just clueless. Literally every store with security cameras puts up a sign on the entrance doors that allows this behavior and there is plenty of case law that supports this. Your wonderful facebook case is a laughably retarded example. Its not even remotely applicable to this conversation.
Im sorry but reality doesnt jive with your reading of laws. Feel free to get laughed out of court attempting to prove me wrong. Its almost like you just googled ‘facial recognition lawsuits’, grabbed the first case that seemed remotely related to this fantasy in your head and ran with with it.
Until you win that magical court case that doesnt exist, stop wasting mine and everyone else’s time with your drivel.
Lol so you did no research. Do I need to spoon feed you everything? Read the law, you need to understand the difference between recording and owning the rights to something or using it in certain ways. You seem stuck on “STORES HAVE CAMERAS!!1” Ya, I know. Maybe take the time and read the laws instead of just ranting about what you think is legal. Weird that those laws I mentioned even exist of it’s not illegal. Weird that even more laws exist about it. Almost like it’s more complicated than security cameras = everyone owns your image.
Im not stuck on anything. Im simply pointing put the fundamental flaw in your understanding. Your just too dense to grasp it.
Bribery of governmental officials is also illegal, and yet an entire industry exists around it.
The video cameras in stores literally contradict your position that its illegal and yet you hold on to the premise.
The fact facebook just added two lines to their ToS and suddenly their ‘illegal’ behavior was changed to legal demonstrates just how fucking dense you are.
Your issue is you havent yet demonstrated any instances of these laws being upheld in any meaningful manner.
And yet with using grocery stores as a simple example ive entirely dissembled your entire position.
So yes you found a law in a single state, that is entirely ineffectual, doesnt apply to the TSA, and has a ‘this law does not apply’ workaround bigger than the fucking sun for everyone else.
Good job champ, let me introduce you to your need special needs counselor, I’ll leave the rest of your education to them.