Lots of people on Lemmy really dislike AI’s current implementations and use cases.

I’m trying to understand what people would want to be happening right now.

Destroy gen AI? Implement laws? Hoping all companies use it for altruistic purposes to help all of mankind?

Thanks for the discourse. Please keep it civil, but happy to be your punching bag.

    • Libra00@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Per: https://www.rwdigital.ca/blog/how-much-energy-do-google-search-and-chatgpt-use/

      Google search currently uses 1.05GWh/day. ChatGPT currently uses 621.4MWh/day

      The per-entry cost for google is about 10% of what it is for GPT but it gets used quite a lot more. So for one user ‘just use google’ is fine, but since are making proscriptions for all of society here we should consider that there are ~300 million cars in the US, even if they were all honda civics they would still burn a shitload of gas and create a shitload of fossil fuel emissions. All I’m saying if the goal is to reduce emissions we should look at the big picture, which will let you understand that taking the bus will do you a lot better than trading in your F-150 for a Civic.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Google search currently uses 1.05GWh/day. ChatGPT currently uses 621.4MWh/day

        And oranges are orange

        It doesn’t matter what the totals are when people are talking about one or the other for a single use.

        Less people commute to work on private jets than buses, are you gonna say jets are fine and buses are the issue?

        Because that’s where your logic ends up