pebbles@sh.itjust.works to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 1 day ago

I'm starting to empathize with Texas trying to leave the Union.

38

I'm starting to empathize with Texas trying to leave the Union.

pebbles@sh.itjust.works to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 1 day ago

I never really understood, but now that that house bill passed that may end up blocking AI regulation from individual States. I get it. I don’t like knowing that even if everyone in my state wanted to stop companies from using AI for hiring decisions, we couldn’t.

Texans, I feel you.

Edit: I’m learning a lot about Texas in this thread. Thanks for all the context folks.

Chat

zephorah@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
8·
1 day ago
I wouldn’t be surprised if the west coast didn’t try to peel off, together. Texas is sticking around, for now.
- Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  4·
  1 day ago
  I pray Cascadia peels away. But I know it will never happen. Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Apple? They’re never going to let us leave in peace.

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

219 users / day
962 users / week
2.71K users / month
7.44K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
3.31K subscribers
557 Posts
11.3K Comments
Modlog